Gas Sensor Protective Cover Cross-Sectional Area Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Gas sensors experience a decrease in response and heat retaining property when the flow speed of measurement-object gas is low, and existing designs struggle to improve detection response without compromising heat retention.

Innovation Solution

A gas sensor design featuring a specific configuration of outer and inner protective covers with defined cross-sectional areas and ratios, ensuring efficient gas flow and heat retention, where the total cross-sectional area ratio A/D is greater than 2.0 and less than or equal to 5.0, and the product of areas A, B, C, and D is between 3000 and 8500, enhancing gas concentration detection response without excessive heat loss.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the flow speed of measurement-object gas is low, then the response of gas concentration detection decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse of gas concentration detectionVSAvoidflow speed of measurement-object gas
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The protective cover is divided into multiple sections with different cross-sectional areas (A, B, C, D) to create controlled flow paths. The segmentation of the flow channel into distinct sections with varying areas allows for optimized gas flow distribution, ensuring adequate flow velocity through the sensor element even when overall flow speed is low, thereby maintaining detection response.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent specifies precise parameter ranges for the cross-sectional areas (A×B×C×D between 3000-8500 mm⁴ and A/D ratio between 2.0-5.0) to optimize gas flow characteristics. By controlling these geometric parameters, the flow velocity through the sensor element is maintained within an optimal range, preventing response degradation at low flow conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If the response of gas concentration detection is increased, then the heat retaining property of the sensor element decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse of gas concentration detectionVSAvoidheat retaining property of sensor element
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

Different sections of the protective cover have different cross-sectional areas designed for specific functions: sections with larger areas (A, B) facilitate gas flow and heat dissipation where needed, while sections with smaller areas (C, D) maintain higher flow velocities for adequate response. This local differentiation of geometric properties allows simultaneous optimization of response and heat retention in different regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The constrained parameter ranges (A×B×C×D between 3000-8500 mm⁴ and A/D ratio between 2.0-5.0) create an optimal balance between flow characteristics and thermal properties. These parameter specifications ensure sufficient gas flow velocity for maintaining response while limiting excessive flow that would cause overheating, achieving a compromise between the two competing requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If the cross-sectional area of inlets is increased to improve flow rate, then the heat retaining property decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow rate of measurement-object gasVSAvoidheat retaining property
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The design employs asymmetric cross-sectional area distribution with A>D and B>C, creating a non-uniform flow path. The inlet sections (A, B) have larger areas to facilitate gas entry and flow, while outlet sections (C, D) have smaller areas to maintain flow velocity and reduce heat loss. This asymmetric configuration optimizes both flow rate and thermal retention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of uniformly increasing all cross-sectional areas to improve flow rate, the patent inverts the conventional approach by creating a decreasing area sequence (A>B>C>D) along the flow path. This inversion ensures adequate flow rate at the inlet while progressively reducing area to maintain velocity and heat retention downstream, achieving both objectives simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design improves the response of gas concentration detection at low flow speeds while maintaining heat retention, ensuring efficient gas flow and minimizing heat loss, thereby optimizing sensor performance.

Implementation Method 1

a sensor element having a gas inlet port that introduces measurement-object gas and capable of detecting a specific gas concentration of the measurement-object gas having flowed in from the gas inlet port

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGas concentration detection:

Implementation Method 2

the outer protective cover and the inner protective cover form, as spaces between the outer protective cover and the inner protective cover, a first gas chamber that is at least part of a flow channel for the measurement-object gas between the one or more outer inlets and the one or more element chamber inlets

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGas flow:

Data Source

PatentUS11226321B2Gas sensor and protective cover
Publication Date: 2022.01.18 NGK INSULATORS LTD
  • US11226321B2 patent drawing
  • US11226321B2 patent drawing
  • US11226321B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A gas sensor includes a sensor element, an inner protective cover having inside a sensor element chamber and having an element chamber inlet and an element chamber outlet, and an outer protective cover having an outer inlet and an outer outlet. A total cross-sectional area A [mm2] of the outer inlet, a total cross-sectional area B [mm2] of the element chamber inlet, a total cross-sectional area C [mm2] of the element chamber outlet, and a total cross-sectional area D [mm2] of the outer outlet satisfy B>A>C>D, a cross-sectional area ratio A/D is greater than a value of 2.0 and less than or equal to a value of 5.0, and A×B×C×D is greater than or equal to a value of 3000 and less than or equal to a value of 8500.