Gas Sensor Poisoning Detection via Multi-Gas Test Station

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Portable gas-measuring devices, especially catalytic sensors, face the challenge of sensor poisoning, which leads to incorrect gas concentration estimation due to varying sensitivity to different gases, resulting in potential hazards in environments like firefighting and petrochemical industries.

Innovation Solution

A method and test station that utilize a control and analysis unit with multiple test modules to recognize gas sensor models, select appropriate test gases, and compare measured values to determine sensor poisoning, ensuring accurate gas concentration estimation by using a first and second test gas to assess sensor functionality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a catalytic sensor is used to detect multiple gases simultaneously, then the sensor can recognize a plurality of different gases (cross sensitivity), but the sensitivity to different gases decreases non-uniformly during aging, leading to selective sensor poisoning

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to detect multiple gasesVSAvoidmeasurement accuracy for specific gases
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The test station performs preliminary testing of the sensor with multiple test gases before actual use to detect selective poisoning. By exposing the sensor to different test gases and comparing measured values against reference values, the system identifies which gases the sensor can no longer detect accurately, allowing for preventive maintenance or calibration adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If the sensor sensitivity is calibrated using one gas (e.g., toluene or nonane), then the sensor maintains adequate detection for that gas, but the sensitivity to other gases (e.g., methane) may decline without being detected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensitivity calibration accuracyVSAvoidundetected sensitivity loss for other gases
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The test station uses multiple test gases (at least two different gases) to comprehensively evaluate sensor performance across different gas types. This multi-functional approach ensures that calibration for one gas does not mask sensitivity loss for other gases, providing a complete assessment of the sensor's detection capabilities across its entire operating range.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Quantity of substance

If the sensor provides a sum signal of all detected gases, then the total gas presence is indicated, but the individual gas concentrations cannot be resolved, leading to incorrect estimation of specific gas levels

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetotal gas detection capabilityVSAvoidindividual gas concentration accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The test station segments the overall sensor response into individual gas-specific measurements by testing with different test gases separately. By comparing the sensor's response to each individual test gas against reference values, the system can identify which specific gases the sensor can no longer detect accurately, even when the sensor previously provided only a combined sum signal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method allows for rapid and accurate detection of sensor poisoning, reducing the risk of incorrect gas concentration estimation and ensuring timely detection of hazardous gases, thus enhancing user safety.

Implementation Method 1

the phenomenon of the so-called sensor poisoning plays a major role in respect to the ability of the gas sensor and hence of the gas-measuring device to function especially in the case of catalytic sensors

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Data Source

PatentUS9063105B2Method for recognizing sensor poisonings and test station for carrying out the method
Publication Date: 2015.06.23 DRAGER SAFETY AG & CO KAAA
  • US9063105B2 patent drawing
  • US9063105B2 patent drawing
  • US9063105B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for recognizing sensor poisonings in portable gas-measuring devices with a test station having a main unit with a control and analysis unit and test modules connected with the main unit for data exchange with an connected device. The test station recognizes device model and/or gas sensor model of the connected device. The main unit has gas inlets for different test gases and there is a first gas feed line for sending test gas to the test modules and a second gas feed line for sending purging gas to the test modules and a gas drain line to return gas from the test modules to the main unit. The method includes detection of a first measured value and of a second measured value and determination of sensor poisoning on the basis of the two values. The test station control and analysis unit carries out the method.