Gas separator

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing heating and cooling systems face inefficiencies in removing gas from liquid flows, leading to re-solution of gas into the liquid and potential delays in degassing due to static floats and inadequate pressure management.

Innovation Solution

A separator device with a housing, float-operated valve, and nozzle that sprays liquid into a gas head to promote degassing, combined with a venturi or pressure control systems to manage pressure and prevent re-solution, ensuring efficient gas removal.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a static float valve is used for gas removal, then the device structure is simple, but gas removal efficiency is low and re-solution occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegas removal efficiencyVSAvoiddevice structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The float is designed to be movable rather than static, allowing it to respond dynamically to gas accumulation levels. The float moves vertically with gas head changes, automatically opening the valve when gas reaches a certain level and closing it when gas is expelled, creating a self-regulating dynamic system that improves gas removal efficiency without requiring complex external control mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The gas removal process operates in periodic cycles: gas accumulates until the float rises sufficiently to open the valve, gas is rapidly expelled, the float descends, and the valve closes. This periodic operation allows the system to handle variable gas loads efficiently, preventing re-solution by maintaining low gas levels in the separation chamber during each cycle.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Productivity

If liquid is sprayed into the housing to promote degassing, then degassing efficiency is improved, but pressure management becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedegassing efficiencyVSAvoidpressure management
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses the liquid flow already present in the heating/cooling circuit to spray into the separation chamber through the nozzle. The liquid serves dual purposes: it promotes degassing by creating droplets with large surface area and simultaneously provides the pressure differential needed for gas expulsion when the float opens the valve. No separate pressure management system is required as the existing system pressure is utilized.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Loss of time

If the float remains stationary, then the valve operation is simple, but delays in gas expulsion occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedelay in gas expulsionVSAvoidvalve operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The float is designed to move freely vertically in response to gas head changes. As gas accumulates, the float rises and automatically triggers valve opening at a predetermined level. This dynamic response eliminates delays associated with stationary floats that require external actuation, while the automatic mechanism keeps the operation simple and maintenance-free.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Quantity of substance

If gas head volume increases before valve opening, then more gas can be removed per cycle, but re-solution of gas into liquid increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegas removed per cycleVSAvoidgas re-solution
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces purely mechanical float-valve operation with a combination of fluid dynamic effects. The nozzle creates liquid spray that enhances mass transfer and promotes bubble formation and detachment. This fluid dynamic approach allows more efficient gas removal at lower gas head volumes, preventing re-solution while maximizing the quantity of gas removed per cycle through enhanced interfacial area and reduced diffusion paths.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively reduces gas re-solution into the liquid and enhances degassing efficiency by maintaining optimal pressure conditions, allowing for timely and efficient expulsion of gas from the system.

Implementation Method 1

The float floats on the surface of the liquid in the housing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBuoyancy: Archimedes' Principle (Buoyancy)

Implementation Method 2

The nozzle can create a jet and/or mist of the liquid in the housing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJet: Jet

Implementation Method 3

The nozzle is arranged higher than the liquid level in the housing... Spraying into the gas head provides the advantage that gas that has been removed from the liquid is directly stored in the gas head

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure drop: Pressure Drop

Data Source

PatentEP3699499A1Gas separator
Publication Date: 2020.08.26 SPIRO ENTERPRISES BV
  • EP3699499A1 patent drawingFigure 1a~1b
  • EP3699499A1 patent drawingFigure 2a
  • EP3699499A1 patent drawingFigure 2b

AI summary

Separator device for separating gas from a liquid flow, including a housing having an inlet and an outlet. The separator device includes a venturi in a liquid flow path extending from the inlet to the outlet. The separator device includes a nozzle in communication with the liquid flow for spraying a part of the liquid of the liquid flow into the housing. The separator device includes a valve for allowing gas to escape from the housing.