Gas Spring Fastener Driver with Parallel Return Mechanisms

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing fastener drivers face power, size, and cost constraints, often requiring external sources of air pressure or energy to drive fasteners into a workpiece.

Innovation Solution

A gas spring fastener driver with a movable drive blade and separate return mechanisms for the drive blade and gas spring, utilizing a pressurized gas stored in a cylinder to drive the blade from a retracted to a driven position, and an extensible cylinder and lifter mechanism to return both to their retracted positions, eliminating the need for external power sources.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If external power sources (compressed air, electrical energy, flywheel mechanisms) are used to drive fasteners, then sufficient driving power is achieved, but device size and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriving powerVSAvoiddevice size
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The gas spring mechanism is integrated within the handle assembly of the fastener driver, with the cylinder and piston nested inside the handle housing. This nesting approach allows the power generation component to be compact and self-contained, eliminating the need for external power sources while maintaining sufficient driving power for fastener insertion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The gas spring mechanism serves as a self-powered system that generates its own driving force through the compression and expansion of gas within the spring. The user's manual compression action stores energy in the gas spring, which then automatically releases to drive the fastener, eliminating dependence on external power sources like compressed air tanks or batteries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Use of energy by moving object

If external power sources are used to drive fasteners, then adequate energy is supplied, but device cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy supplyVSAvoiddevice cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The gas spring mechanism is a self-contained energy system that requires no external power supply infrastructure. The energy is stored mechanically within the gas spring during the user's compression action and released automatically during fastener driving, eliminating the need for expensive external power sources such as compressed air compressors or battery packs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The invention utilizes a gas spring mechanism that employs compressed gas as the energy storage medium. This pneumatic approach provides a cost-effective alternative to electrical or mechanical flywheel systems, as gas springs are relatively simple, inexpensive components that can store sufficient energy for fastener driving without requiring complex external power infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

3Device complexity

If the gas spring mechanism is returned to retracted state with the drive blade, then mechanism simplicity is maintained, but power consumption increases and cycle time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanism simplicityVSAvoidcycle time
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The return mechanism is divided into two independent segments: one for returning the drive blade and another for returning the gas spring mechanism. This segmentation allows each component to be returned through optimized paths, reducing the overall cycle time while maintaining reasonable mechanical complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs dynamic return mechanisms that can operate independently and simultaneously. The drive blade return and gas spring return are decoupled, allowing each to be optimized for its specific motion requirements. This dynamic approach reduces the total time required for the complete return cycle compared to a coupled, sequential return system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Productivity

If separate return mechanisms are used for drive blade and gas spring, then cycle time is reduced and productivity increases, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecycle timeVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The return function is segmented into two independent mechanisms: a first return mechanism for the drive blade and a second return mechanism for the gas spring. This segmentation enables parallel operation, reducing cycle time, while the modular nature of the segmented design allows for efficient manufacturing and assembly, partially offsetting the complexity increase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The separate return mechanisms are designed to perform multiple functions within the overall system. The first return mechanism not only returns the drive blade but also contributes to resetting the fastener feeding mechanism. The second return mechanism returns the gas spring and simultaneously prepares the power system for the next cycle. This multi-functionality reduces the need for additional dedicated components, thereby limiting the increase in overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design allows for rapid and efficient driving of fasteners into a workpiece by reducing cycle time and minimizing power consumption, as the gas spring mechanism is self-powered and the return mechanisms operate in parallel, enhancing the speed and efficiency of fastener placement.

Implementation Method 1

a gas spring mechanism for driving the drive blade from the retracted position to the driven position. The gas spring mechanism is moveable between a retracted state and a driven state

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic potential energy: Spring

Implementation Method 2

utilizing a pressurized gas stored in a cylinder to drive the blade from a retracted to a driven position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGas expansion: Pressure Increase

Data Source

PatentUS11110576B2Gas spring fastener driver
Publication Date: 2021.09.07 TECHTRONIC CORDLESS GP
  • US11110576B2 patent drawing
  • US11110576B2 patent drawing
  • US11110576B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A fastener driver includes a drive blade movable from a retracted position to a driven position for driving a fastener into a work piece. The fastener driver further includes a gas spring mechanism for driving the drive blade from the retracted position to the driven position. The gas spring mechanism is moveable between a retracted state and a driven state. The fastener driver further includes a first return mechanism for moving the drive blade from the driven position toward the retracted position, and a second return mechanism for returning the gas spring mechanism toward the retracted state separately from movement of the drive blade.