Gas Turbine Controller Using 2D Operating Area for Flexible Load Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Combined cycle power plants face challenges in flexible control due to frequent start-ups and shut-downs driven by variable electricity demand, leading to inefficiencies and increased wear on equipment, particularly in managing gas turbine operations and emissions.

Innovation Solution

A system and method utilizing a controller to manage gas turbine operations within a defined 2-dimensional control area, allowing independent control of air flow and fuel flow to achieve specific setpoints and rates, prioritizing equipment life, emissions, and startup efficiency, while adhering to operational constraints such as emissions standards and HRSG limitations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the combined cycle power plant operates with frequent start-ups and shut-downs to meet variable electricity demand, then the adaptability to grid demand increases, but the equipment wear increases and startup efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to grid demandVSAvoidequipment life
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control system dynamically adjusts operating parameters (fuel flow, air flow, valve positions) in real-time during startup and operation. The system transitions from static control to dynamic control, allowing continuous adaptation to changing grid demand while optimizing startup sequences to minimize thermal stress and equipment wear.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes multiple operating parameters simultaneously and in a coordinated manner during startup. By pre-planning and executing coordinated changes in fuel flow rate, air flow, turbine inlet temperature, and valve positions, the system achieves faster startups while maintaining equipment integrity through controlled parameter transitions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If traditional control methods are used for gas turbine operations, then the device complexity remains low, but the startup time increases and operational efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestartup timeVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The startup process is segmented into distinct phases (cold startup, warm startup, hot startup) with predefined control sequences for each phase. This segmentation allows the complex startup process to be managed through modular, phase-specific control routines, reducing the perceived complexity while enabling optimized startup paths for each condition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The control system pre-calculates and pre-plans optimal startup sequences before actual startup occurs. By pre-establishing control parameter trajectories and valve timing sequences based on the selected startup type, the system eliminates real-time decision delays and achieves faster, more consistent startup times.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Object-generated harmful factors

If emissions control is prioritized during operation, then emissions compliance improves, but the operational flexibility and load adjustment capability decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveemissionsVSAvoidoperational flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The control system continuously monitors emissions parameters (NOx, CO, unburned hydrocarbons) and uses this feedback to dynamically adjust fuel-air mixture ratios, combustion timing, and aftertreatment system operation. This closed-loop control maintains emissions compliance while allowing flexible load adjustments within the emissions constraint boundary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically balances emissions control with operational flexibility by continuously adapting combustion parameters based on load conditions. During transient operations, the system prioritizes stable combustion to control emissions, while during steady-state operation, it allows greater flexibility for load following within emissions limits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables flexible and efficient operation of combined cycle power plants, reducing start-up times, improving equipment life, and enhancing emissions control by allowing precise management of gas turbine load and exhaust temperature within defined operational boundaries.

Implementation Method 1

the gas turbine systems combust a fuel-air mixture to create torque that drives a load

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Implementation Method 2

the combined cycle power plants use the thermal energy in the gas turbine system exhaust gases to create steam

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat transfer: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 3

The steam travels through a steam turbine system creating torque that drives a load such as an electrical generator

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal energy conversion:

Data Source

PatentUS10006315B2System and method for improved control of a combined cycle power plant
Publication Date: 2018.06.26 GE INFRASTRUCTURE TECH LLC
  • US10006315B2 patent drawing
  • US10006315B2 patent drawing
  • US10006315B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, methods, and tangible non-transitory machine readable medium are provided. A system includes a gas turbine system configured to produce power by combusting a fuel. The system further includes a controller configured to control the gas turbine system via an operating 2-dimensional surface area and a setpoint, wherein the operating 2-dimensional surface area comprises a plurality of limits defining bounds for the operating 2-dimensional surface area, and wherein the setpoint is configured to be disposed inside the operating 2-dimentionsal surface area or on the limits.