Gas Turbine Efficiency Control Using Adaptive Operating States

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing gas turbine systems face inefficiencies due to heat loss during energy conversion and transmission, which are not effectively managed by current control methods, leading to suboptimal mechanical efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising a gas turbine with a compressor and turbine coupled through a shaft, along with a processing system that automatically adjusts operating conditions based on real-time efficiency calculations and ambient conditions, using multi-dimensional maps to optimize performance and minimize heat loss.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If traditional control methods are used for gas turbine systems, then the system operation is simple, but mechanical efficiency is suboptimal due to unmanaged heat loss

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat lossVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system continuously monitors operating conditions and efficiency metrics, then adjusts control parameters in real-time to maximize mechanical efficiency. This closed-loop feedback mechanism enables the system to adapt to changing conditions and minimize heat loss dynamically.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The control system transitions from static, pre-programmed control to dynamic, real-time adjustment of operating parameters. The system continuously iterates through operating states and selects optimal parameters based on current efficiency calculations, allowing adaptive optimization rather than fixed control schedules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If the control system iterates through multiple operating states to maximize efficiency, then mechanical efficiency improves, but the control process complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy conversion efficiencyVSAvoidcontrol process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system autonomously iterates through operating states, calculates efficiency metrics, and selects optimal parameters without external intervention. The system self-regulates by continuously evaluating its own performance and making independent adjustments to maximize mechanical efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces complex mechanical control mechanisms with computational algorithms that iterate through operating states and calculate optimal parameters. This substitution of mechanical control with intelligent software-based control achieves high efficiency through information processing rather than mechanical adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If real-time efficiency calculations are performed, then operating efficiency optimizes, but computational requirements and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveefficiency measurement accuracyVSAvoidprocessing system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system uses intermediate calculations and models to estimate efficiency metrics based on readily available sensor data. Rather than requiring complex direct measurements, the system employs computational intermediaries that translate simple sensor readings into meaningful efficiency indicators for control optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system enhances mechanical efficiency by iteratively adjusting operating states to maximize efficiency, reducing heat loss and improving overall performance, thereby optimizing energy conversion and transmission.

Implementation Method 1

a gas turbine can convert chemical energy stored in jet fuel into mechanical energy stored in a spinning turbine

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Implementation Method 2

some of the mechanical energy transmitted from a spinning turbine to a mainshaft will be lost as heat as mainshaft frictionally engages radial support bearings

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 3

electrical resistance will convert electrical energy transmitted through wires into heat

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJoule heating: Joule Heating

Data Source

PatentUS11578667B2Efficiency-based machine control
Publication Date: 2023.02.14 ROLLS ROYCE CORP
  • US11578667B2 patent drawing
  • US11578667B2 patent drawing
  • US11578667B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system can include a gas turbine and a processing system. The gas turbine can include a compressor coupled to a turbine through a shaft. The processing system can be configured to: automatically transition an operating condition of the system through a plurality of operating states; determine an efficiency of the system at each of a plurality of the operating states; for each of the plurality of operating states: select a future operating state of the system based on the determined efficiency of the current operating state.