Gas Cylinder Valve Check-Seat Design for Authorized Refilling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing gas cylinder valves do not allow refilling by end consumers while enabling refilling by authorized providers, and they often require complex assembly and have space constraints.

Innovation Solution

A valve design with a check-valve seat that is resiliently urged against the body, opening the gas passage when a refill differential pressure reaches a predetermined threshold, allowing authorized refilling while preventing unauthorized refilling, and incorporating an excess flow valve to manage gas flow.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a check-valve with spring finger detents is used to prevent refilling, then refilling prevention is achieved, but the available cross area for the check-valve spring is restricted and assembly becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverefilling preventionVSAvoidassembly difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the spring finger detents from the check-valve assembly and extracts the refilling prevention function to a separate excess flow valve mechanism. This allows the check-valve spring to have adequate cross area and simplifies assembly by eliminating the complex interaction between spring fingers and detents.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent divides the refilling prevention function into separate components: the check-valve for one-directional flow control and the excess flow valve for refilling prevention. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently, improving manufacturability while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If a check-valve with spring finger detents is used to prevent refilling, then refilling prevention is achieved, but lateral space requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverefilling preventionVSAvoidlateral space
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the refilling prevention function from the check-valve assembly and implements it in the excess flow valve, which utilizes the existing lateral space more efficiently. This reduces the overall lateral space requirement compared to traditional spring finger detent designs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Reliability

If the check-valve seat is resiliently urged against the body with a spring, then the gas passage opens at predetermined pressure threshold, but the spring occupies space and adds complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure threshold controlVSAvoidspring mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the check-valve spring serve multiple functions: it provides the resilient urging force for pressure threshold control and simultaneously acts as the excess flow valve closing member. This multi-functionality reduces device complexity by eliminating separate components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the check-valve spring with the excess flow valve closing member into a single component. This combination reduces the number of parts and simplifies the overall valve mechanism while maintaining reliable pressure threshold control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively prevents unauthorized refilling while optimizing gas flow during authorized refilling by adjusting the pressure differential with a check-valve spring and diffusing flow radially around the housing, ensuring secure and efficient refilling operations.

Implementation Method 1

the check-valve seat is resiliently urged against the body and configured to move away from the body so as to open the gas passage when subjected to a refill differential pressure reaching a predetermined threshold

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

The check-valve comprises a spring located in the housing and resiliently urging the check-valve seat against the body

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring: Spring

Implementation Method 3

the check-valve seat is resiliently urged against the body and configured to move away from the body so as to open the gas passage when subjected to a refill differential pressure reaching a predetermined threshold

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure gradient: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentUS20240200678A1Valve for gas cylinder with check-valve preventing unofficial refilling
Publication Date: 2024.06.20 ROTAREX SA
  • US20240200678A1 patent drawing
  • US20240200678A1 patent drawing
  • US20240200678A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A valve for a gas tank, comprising a body comprising an engaging portion for sealingly engaging with a gas tank, a gas inlet, a gas outlet, and a gas passage fluidly connecting the gas inlet and the gas outlet; a shut-off device in the gas passage; a check-valve comprising a check-valve seat in the gas passage; a check-valve obturator configured for contacting the check-valve seat and thereby closing the gas passage in the presence of a refill gas flow from the gas outlet to the gas inlet; wherein the check-valve seat is resiliently urged against the body and configured to move away from the body so as to open the gas passage when subjected to a refill differential pressure reaching a predetermined threshold.