Gasification of High-Ash Feedstock via Carbon Coating and Acid Gas Stripping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing gasification processes face challenges with high ash content feedstocks, leading to equipment damage, short syngas effluent cooler lifetime, and increased risk of plugging due to high carbon-to-ash ratios and ash fouling.

Innovation Solution

A process that gasifies residue streams with lower carbon-to-ash ratios, removes solids from recycled water, and strips acid gases to prevent precipitation, allowing for efficient operation in a non-slagging regime and reducing the risk of plugging.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If ash content in feedstock is increased to process challenging streams, then economic value is improved through higher-value products, but equipment damage and short lifetime occur due to ash fouling and plugging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveeconomic valueVSAvoidequipment lifetime
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the operating temperature parameter to below ash fusion temperature, preventing ash from melting and forming molten slag that causes fouling and plugging, thereby extending equipment lifetime while still processing high-ash feedstock

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a carbon coating layer as an intermediary substance that forms on ash particles, preventing direct contact between ash and equipment surfaces, thus reducing fouling and extending equipment lifetime

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If carbon-to-ash ratio is increased to coat ash particles, then fouling is reduced, but downstream solids removal system size increases becoming impractical

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovefoulingVSAvoidsolids removal system size
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the carbon-to-ash ratio parameter to a specific range (2:1 to 5:1 by weight), providing sufficient carbon coating to prevent fouling while avoiding excessive carbon that would require oversized solids removal systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial carbon coating sufficient to prevent ash particle sticking and fouling, rather than excessive coating that would create agglomeration problems and require larger solids removal systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Ease of manufacture

If operation is conducted in slagging regime above ash fusion temperature, then ash forms molten slag that can be separated, but costs increase due to higher oxygen usage and reduced refractory lifetime

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveash separationVSAvoidoxygen usage
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSUse of energy by stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent inverts the conventional approach by operating below ash fusion temperature instead of above it, preventing ash from melting and forming molten slag, thus avoiding the need for high oxygen consumption and refractory protection while still enabling effective ash management

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

4Device complexity

If ash is not coated with sufficient carbon, then carbon coating thickness is reduced, but ash particles stick to surfaces and cause fouling problems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecarbon coating thicknessVSAvoidfouling
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the carbon-to-ash ratio parameter to ensure sufficient carbon coating thickness on ash particles, preventing particle sticking and fouling while maintaining manageable system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The process achieves reduced solids loading in solids removal systems, increased hydrocarbon conversion to syngas, and improved metal recovery by operating at lower carbon-to-ash ratios and minimizing ash fouling.

Implementation Method 1

reacting the residue stream with an oxidant stream in a gasifier to produce a hot syngas stream comprising carbon monoxide, hydrogen, and soot

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPartial oxidation: Oxidation

Implementation Method 2

contacting the hot syngas stream with a quench water stream to produce a quenched syngas stream and a water bath in the gasifier

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat transfer: Heat Exchanger

Implementation Method 3

filtering the concentrated soot water stream to produce a solid filter cake and a liquid filtrate stream

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFiltration: Filter (physical)

Implementation Method 4

stripping a first sour gas stream from the primary filtrate fraction to produce a stripped water stream

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectStripping: Desorption

Data Source

PatentUS12264067B2Gasification of high-ash feedstock
Publication Date: 2025.04.01 AIR PROD & CHEM INC
  • US12264067B2 patent drawing
  • US12264067B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A residue stream comprising liquid hydrocarbons and metal-rich solid particles is reacted with an oxidant stream in a gasifier to produce a syngas stream that is quenched in a water bath. The risk of plugging in the water lines is reduced by removing solids from the recycled water streams. Acid gases are stripped from at least a portion of the recycled water to reduce the risk of precipitates forming from the reaction of dissolved acid gases with metal ions.