Gasoline Hydrodesulfurization Sequence for Low Mercaptan and Octane Retention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for producing low-sulfur gasoline face challenges in reducing mercaptan content while maintaining octane rating and minimizing hydrogen consumption, particularly in catalytic cracking processes where recombination mercaptans are difficult to remove without causing gasoline cracking or catalyst coking.

Innovation Solution

A process involving a sequence of two hydrodesulfurization reactors with specific catalysts and conditions, followed by H₂S separation, allows for the selective conversion and removal of recombination mercaptans under mild conditions, using catalysts with Group VIB and Group VIII metals supported on alumina, with controlled temperature and hydrogen flow rates.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If traditional catalytic hydrodesulfurization processes are used to desulfurize high-sulfur base gasolines, then sulfur content is reduced, but monoolefins are hydrogenated resulting in significant loss of octane rating and high hydrogen consumption

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesulfur contentVSAvoidhydrogen consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the operating parameters by conducting hydrodesulfurization at lower temperatures (200-350°C) and using specific catalyst formulations (CoMo or NiMo on alumina) to achieve selective desulfurization. This parameter optimization allows reducing sulfur content while minimizing unwanted olefin hydrogenation and reducing hydrogen consumption compared to traditional high-temperature processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention applies local quality by using specific catalyst formulations with particular metal compositions (CoMo or NiMo) supported on alumina with controlled surface area and pore volume. These locally optimized catalyst properties enable selective hydrodesulfurization activity while maintaining olefin stability, addressing the contradiction between sulfur removal and octane preservation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Quantity of substance

If traditional catalytic hydrodesulfurization processes are used to desulfurize high-sulfur base gasolines, then sulfur content is reduced, but octane rating is significantly lost due to monoolefin hydrogenation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesulfur contentVSAvoidoctane rating
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The invention optimizes process parameters including temperature (200-350°C), pressure (3-10 bar), and space velocity (0.5-5 h⁻¹) to achieve selective hydrodesulfurization. These parameter changes ensure that sulfur compounds are converted to H2S and removed while monoolefins remain largely unaffected, preserving octane rating

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses locally optimized catalyst formulations (CoMo or NiMo on alumina with specific surface area 100-300 m²/g and pore volume 0.3-0.6 cm³/g) that provide high desulfurization activity with low olefin hydrogenation activity, thus maintaining octane stability while reducing sulfur content

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Quantity of substance

If severe conditions are used to remove recombination mercaptans, then mercaptan content is reduced, but gasoline cracking and catalyst coking occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemercaptan contentVSAvoidcatalyst life
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the operating conditions by conducting the process at moderate temperatures (200-350°C) and pressures (3-10 bar) with controlled space velocity (0.5-5 h⁻¹). These parameter changes create a thermodynamic environment favorable for mercaptan decomposition and H2S removal while avoiding severe conditions that would cause gasoline cracking and catalyst coking

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses an intermediary approach by introducing a two-stage process with an intermediate storage step. The first stage converts sulfur compounds to H2S, which is then removed in the intermediate step. The second stage completes desulfurization under milder conditions, preventing catalyst deactivation while achieving low mercaptan content

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Quantity of substance

If severe conditions are used to remove recombination mercaptans, then mercaptan content is reduced, but energy costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemercaptan contentVSAvoidenergy costs
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSUse of energy by stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention optimizes energy parameters by operating at moderate temperatures (200-350°C) and pressures (3-10 bar) with controlled space velocity (0.5-5 h⁻¹). These parameter changes reduce the energy input required compared to severe conditions, while still achieving mercaptan removal through favorable thermodynamic equilibrium and efficient H2S removal in the intermediate storage step

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The process effectively reduces mercaptan content to below 10 ppm while limiting octane loss and hydrogen consumption, suitable for existing refinery units with improved catalyst life and reduced energy costs.

Implementation Method 1

a) In at least one reactor, gasoline, hydrogen and a hydrodesulfurization catalyst comprising an oxide support and an active phase comprising a metal from group VIB and a metal from group VIII are contacted at a temperature between 210 and 320°C

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 2

The first stage, also called the selective HDS stage, generally aims to achieve deep desulfurization of the gasoline with minimal olefin saturation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrogenation: Hydrogenation

Implementation Method 3

c) a separation step of the H2S formed and present in the effluent from step b is carried out

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase separation:

Data Source

PatentEP4004158B1Method for producing gasoline with low sulfur and mercaptan content
Publication Date: 2026.02.25 IFP ENERGIES NOUVELLES
  • EP4004158B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4004158B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4004158B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present application relates to a method for treating a gasoline containing sulfur-containing compounds and olefins, comprising the following steps: a) a step of hydrodesulfurization in the presence of a catalyst comprising an oxide support and an active phase comprising a group VIB metal and a group VIII metal, b) a step of hydrodesulfurization at a higher temperature than that of step a) and in the presence of a catalyst comprising an oxide support and an active phase constituted of at least one group VIII metal, c) a step of separating the H2S formed, d) a step of hydrodesulfurization with a low hydrogen/feedstock ratio and in the presence of a hydrodesulfurization catalyst comprising an oxide support and an active phase comprising a group VIB metal and a group VIII metal or an active phase constituted of at least one group VIII metal, e) a step of separating the H2S formed.