Power Transistor Gate Driver With Adaptive Boost Interval Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Power transistors, especially silicon carbide (SiC) transistors, face challenges in optimizing switching processes due to large operating ranges, leading to oscillation and energy losses, which are difficult to manage with simple control methods, and require complex control to balance switching speed and efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A gate driver system with a multistage gate driver circuit that includes a controller to regulate the length of the boost interval based on measured transistor parameters, such as the time derivative of the drain current, to optimize switching speed and reduce oscillation and energy losses.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If simple control with two voltage levels and series resistor is used, then device complexity is reduced, but switching speed and energy loss optimization deteriorates across wide operating range

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol circuit complexityVSAvoidswitching speed optimization
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The control device dynamically adjusts the duration of the acceleration phase based on real-time operation point vector measurements (VDC, iD, junction temperature, gate driver voltage). This dynamic adaptation allows the system to optimize switching speed for each specific operating condition, resolving the contradiction between simple control structure and optimized switching performance across wide operating ranges.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes control parameters (acceleration phase duration) based on measured operation point vectors. By continuously monitoring voltage, current, temperature, and adjusting the timing parameters accordingly, the system achieves optimal switching performance without requiring complex fixed control circuits, thus resolving the contradiction between simplicity and performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of energy

If switching speed is increased to reduce switching losses, then energy efficiency is improved, but oscillation tendency and electromagnetic interference worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveswitching lossesVSAvoidoscillation and electromagnetic interference
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The control device implements a two-phase switching process with a distinct acceleration phase followed by a constant current phase. This periodic structure allows the system to initially increase switching speed to reduce losses, then transition to a controlled deceleration phase that minimizes oscillation and electromagnetic interference, thus resolving the contradiction between energy efficiency and harmful emissions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the duration of the acceleration phase based on real-time operation conditions. By optimizing the timing of each phase according to measured parameters (voltage, current, temperature), the system achieves fast switching to reduce losses while preventing excessive oscillation and electromagnetic interference, resolving the contradiction between energy efficiency and harmful factors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If switching speed is increased beyond manufacturer limit, then productivity is improved, but reliability deteriorates due to electrical overload risk

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveswitching frequencyVSAvoidelectrical overload protection
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control device continuously measures the operation point vector (VDC, iD, junction temperature, gate driver voltage) and uses this feedback to adjust the acceleration phase duration. This closed-loop control ensures that switching speed is optimized for each operating condition while automatically preventing electrical overload by respecting manufacturer limits, thus resolving the contradiction between productivity and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Productivity

If multi-stage control is implemented to optimize switching process, then switching speed and energy loss are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveswitching process optimizationVSAvoidcontrol device complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The switching process is segmented into two distinct phases: acceleration phase and constant current phase. This segmentation allows independent optimization of each phase duration based on operation point vectors, achieving superior switching performance without requiring excessively complex control circuitry. The segmented approach resolves the contradiction between optimization and complexity by breaking down the control function into manageable stages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11031929B1Actively tracking switching speed control of a power transistor
Publication Date: 2021.06.08 INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG
  • US11031929B1 patent drawing
  • US11031929B1 patent drawing
  • US11031929B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of driving a transistor includes generating an off-current during a plurality of turn-off switching events to control a gate voltage at a gate terminal of the transistor, wherein generating the off-current includes sinking a first portion of the off-current from the gate terminal to discharge a first portion of the gate voltage, and sinking, during a boost interval, a second portion of the off-current from the gate terminal to discharge a second portion of the gate voltage; measuring a transistor parameter indicative of an oscillation of a drain-source voltage of the transistor for a first turn-off switching event during which the transistor is transitioned off; activating the first portion of the off-current for a second turn-off switching event; and activating the second portion of the off-current for the second turn-off switching event, including regulating a length of the boost interval based on the measured transistor parameter.