Gate Driver Circuit Minimizing Dead Time to Prevent Shoot-Through

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current gate driver circuits for half-bridge field effect transistors (FETs) face limitations in flexibility and cost, with integrated circuits (ICs) being inflexible and costly, while general purpose component (GCB) drivers require additional components for protection and increased costs due to the need for shunt resistors and microcontrollers for dead time offset generation.

Innovation Solution

A gate driver circuit that includes a signal conversion circuit to generate a high-side drive signal with a delay time that separates transitions from the low-side drive signal, and a monitoring circuit to prevent shoot-through by controlling the low-side output based on output voltage thresholds, eliminating the need for shunt resistors and dead time offsets between gate signal pairs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a gate driver IC is used, then protection function is provided, but flexibility in device characteristic specifications is reduced and cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection functionVSAvoidflexibility in device characteristic specifications
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The gate driver circuit is segmented into separate functional blocks: a control circuit for generating gate signals, a monitoring circuit for detecting shoot-through conditions, and a protection circuit for responding to faults. This modular segmentation allows each block to be independently optimized and configured, providing both protection functionality and flexibility in device characteristic specifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If a GCB gate driver is used, then flexibility in design is permitted, but additional components are required for protecting the low side FET

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility in designVSAvoidadditional components
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The monitoring circuit and protection functionality are merged into the gate driver circuit itself. The monitoring circuit detects shoot-through conditions by monitoring the state of the low side FET, and the protection circuit responds by controlling the gate signals. This integration eliminates the need for separate external protection components such as shunt resistors and operational amplifiers, reducing device complexity while maintaining design flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The gate driver circuit is designed with multi-functionality, serving both as a control circuit for generating gate signals and as a protection circuit for detecting and responding to shoot-through conditions. This universal design allows a single circuit to perform multiple functions, eliminating the need for additional dedicated protection components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If shunt resistor and operational amplifier are added for protection, then low side FET protection is improved, but circuit path resistance increases and cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelow side FET protectionVSAvoidcircuit path resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The protection functionality is extracted from external components (shunt resistors and operational amplifiers) and integrated directly into the gate driver circuit. This extraction eliminates the need for additional current sensing components that would increase circuit path resistance and associated power losses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Reliability

If dead time offset is implemented between gate signal pairs, then shoot-through protection is provided, but complexity of gate drive increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshoot-through protectionVSAvoidcomplexity of gate drive
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The monitoring circuit continuously monitors the state of the low side FET in advance before the high side FET is turned on. By detecting the off-state of the low side FET beforehand, the control circuit can safely activate the high side FET without requiring complex dead time offset calculations or multiple PWM signal pairs, thus providing shoot-through protection with reduced complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11152857B2Gate driver circuit for half bridge MOSFET switches providing protection of the switch devices
Publication Date: 2021.10.19 FLEXTRONICS AP LLC
  • US11152857B2 patent drawing
  • US11152857B2 patent drawing
  • US11152857B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A gate driver circuit which may include an input; high-side and low-side outputs; a signal conversion circuit configured to generate a high-side drive signal at the high-side output such that a delay time separates a transition of the high-side drive signal and a transition of a low-side drive signal at the low-side output; and a monitoring circuit configured to monitor a voltage at an output of a half-bridge and to pull the low-side output to a level for turning off a low-side switching device of the half-bridge on a condition that the voltage exceeds a voltage threshold. The monitoring circuit may control the low-side drive signal such that the delay time is a minimum delay necessary to prevent shoot-through of the half-bridge. The signal conversion circuit may generate the high-side drive signal such that the delay time is a minimum delay necessary to prevent shoot-through of the half-bridge.