Gate Driving Circuit Parallel Control for Transistor Overshoot

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing gate driving circuits for power supply systems face challenges in efficiently controlling the gate voltage of transistors, particularly in high-speed switching applications, where overshoot and undershoot can lead to transistor damage and reduced efficiency.

Innovation Solution

The use of two secondary control ICs (103a and 103b) connected in parallel to the gate of a transistor, each optimized for rising and falling edge control, ensures separate management of overshoot and undershoot, with waveform shaping circuits tailored for each edge to prevent transistor damage and improve switching speed.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a single control circuit is used to control the gate voltage of the transistor, then the device complexity is reduced, but the ability to separately manage overshoot and undershoot is compromised, leading to potential transistor damage and reduced efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransistor operation reliabilityVSAvoidcontrol circuit complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control circuit is divided into two separate control circuits: a first control circuit that generates a first control signal to control the turning-on of the switching transistor, and a second control circuit that generates a second control signal to control the turning-off of the switching transistor. This segmentation allows independent optimization of turn-on and turn-off characteristics, enabling separate management of overshoot and undershoot phenomena, thereby improving transistor operation reliability without requiring excessive complexity in a single unified circuit

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different control strategies are applied to different phases of the switching operation. The first control circuit is optimized for turn-on characteristics with appropriate waveform shaping to control rising edge overshoot, while the second control circuit is optimized for turn-off characteristics with waveform shaping to control falling edge undershoot. This local quality approach allows each control circuit to be tailored specifically for its function, improving overall reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Productivity

If high-speed switching is implemented to improve productivity, then the switching speed increases, but overshoot and undershoot phenomena worsen, potentially causing transistor damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveswitching speedVSAvoidtransistor safety
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control circuits incorporate waveform shaping circuits that preemptively counteract the overshoot and undershoot phenomena before they can cause damage. By designing the control signals with appropriate shaping characteristics in advance, the system prevents the harmful effects of high-speed switching while maintaining the benefits of fast switching operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The control system dynamically adjusts the gate voltage waveform characteristics based on the switching phase. During turn-on, the first control circuit provides dynamic waveform shaping to control the rising edge and prevent overshoot. During turn-off, the second control circuit provides dynamic waveform shaping to control the falling edge and prevent undershoot. This dynamic adaptation allows high-speed switching while maintaining transistor safety

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If waveform shaping circuits are added to control overshoot and undershoot, then the reliability improves, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveswitching operation reliabilityVSAvoidcircuit component count
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The waveform shaping functions are merged into the control circuits themselves rather than being implemented as separate external components. The first control circuit includes a first waveform shaping circuit, and the second control circuit includes a second waveform shaping circuit. This integration achieves reliable overshoot and undershoot control while minimizing additional device complexity by combining multiple functions within the control circuit architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS10715026B2Gate driving circuit and power supply circuit
Publication Date: 2020.07.14 TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CO LTD
  • US10715026B2 patent drawing
  • US10715026B2 patent drawing
  • US10715026B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A gate driving circuit includes a first transistor, a first control circuit that changes a gate voltage of the first transistor from a low level to a high level, and a second control circuit that changes the gate voltage of the first transistor from the high level to the low level, wherein the first control circuit and the second control circuit are coupled to each other in parallel with respect to a gate of the first transistor.