Gate Electrode Formation via Double Exposure and Spacer Shrink

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing two-step patterning process for forming gate electrode structures in semiconductor devices faces challenges with reduced scalability and controllability, particularly in defining the gate width, as device dimensions continue to shrink, leading to significant device variations and complexity in lithography and etch processes.

Innovation Solution

A double exposure double etching sequence is employed, where a mask opening is formed with reduced lateral dimensions by using spacer elements on inner sidewalls to define circuit features, allowing for superior controllability and scalability in defining both gate length and width, using deposition and anisotropic etch techniques to achieve uniformity and reduce process complexity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional two-step patterning process is used to form gate electrode structures, then gate length can be defined, but gate width control and scalability deteriorate as device dimensions shrink

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegate length definitionVSAvoidscalability to reduced dimensions
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the patterning process into distinct steps: first forming mask features defining gate length, then forming a mandrel layer and openings to define gate width. This segmentation allows independent optimization of length and width definition, resolving the contradiction between maintaining precision in one dimension while adapting to scaling in another.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a vertical dimension by forming a mandrel layer (e.g., silicon nitride) beneath the mask layer and using openings through this layer to define gate width. This dimensional approach enables precise width control independent of the lateral lithography process used for length definition, improving scalability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Productivity

If device dimensions are reduced to achieve higher integration density, then productivity improves, but manufacturing precision deteriorates due to process variations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintegration densityVSAvoiddevice dimension control
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs self-aligned processes where the mandrel layer and openings automatically define the gate width position relative to the mask features. This self-alignment eliminates the need for additional lithography alignment steps, maintaining precision while enabling scaling for higher productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the physical state and properties of materials through the process sequence: forming a mandrel layer with specific etch selectivity, creating openings with controlled dimensions, and using these as templates for gate electrode formation. These parameter changes enable precise dimension control at scaled sizes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If complex lithography techniques are used to print features below wavelength, then manufacturing precision improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresist feature critical dimensionVSAvoidlithography and etch process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the patterning function into separate layers: the mask layer handles length definition through conventional lithography, while the mandrel layer with openings handles width definition through simpler deposition and etch processes. This segmentation reduces overall process complexity while maintaining precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The mandrel layer acts as an intermediary structure that translates the mask feature pattern into precisely defined gate width openings. This intermediate layer simplifies the overall process by decoupling the complex lithography step from the width definition step.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables the formation of gate electrode structures with precise gate length and reduced lateral distance in the width direction, enhancing device uniformity and reducing overall process complexity compared to conventional methods.

Implementation Method 1

forming a spacer element on inner sidewalls of the mask opening so as to reduce the first width

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhysical Vapour Deposition: Physical Vapour Deposition

Implementation Method 2

forming a mask feature in the mask layer by using the resist mask feature and the mask opening

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAnisotropic Etching:

Data Source

PatentUS8728924B2Gate electrodes of a semiconductor device formed by a hard mask and double exposure in combination with a shrink spacer
Publication Date: 2014.05.20 GLOBALFOUNDRIES US INC
  • US8728924B2 patent drawing
  • US8728924B2 patent drawing
  • US8728924B2 patent drawing

AI summary

When forming complex gate electrode structures, a double exposure double etch strategy may be applied, in which the lateral distance in the width direction of the gate electrode structures may be defined prior to forming mask features for defining the gate length. In this case, the width dimension of the mask opening may be adjusted on the basis of a spacer element, which may thus allow providing a reduced dimension on the basis of well-established process techniques.