Gate Extension Segmentation for Backside Power Rail Routing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing methods for connecting gate contacts to backside power rails in semiconductor devices are challenging, especially in decreasing node sizes, due to limited placement options and difficulty in maintaining electrical integrity.

Innovation Solution

The solution involves forming a gate extension within the region between two transistors of opposite conductivity, cutting the gate extension into portions using a gate cut, and connecting each portion to a backside power rail via local interconnects, thereby facilitating efficient wire routing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If gate contacts are placed in N2N or P2P spaces under adjacent transistors, then power distribution is simplified, but gate contact placement options are limited and routing becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower distribution routingVSAvoidgate contact placement options
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extends the gate contact into the third dimension by creating a vertical gate extension through the substrate, allowing the gate to reach the backside of the device. This dimensional transition enables gate contacts to be placed in constrained front-side regions while maintaining routing flexibility at the backside, resolving the contradiction between limited placement options and routing difficulty.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The gate structure is segmented into multiple portions along its length, with different sections serving different functions: the front-side portion connects to the gate electrode, the intermediate portion extends through the substrate, and the backside portion connects to power rails. This segmentation allows each portion to be optimized independently for its specific function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If node sizes are decreased to increase transistor density, then device integration is improved, but maintaining electrical integrity of conductive components becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransistor densityVSAvoidelectrical integrity of conductive components
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different material properties and structural characteristics to different portions of the gate structure. The gate extension portions are designed with specific width variations, and different regions use different filling materials (conductive material vs. dielectric material) to optimize local electrical characteristics. This local quality approach maintains electrical integrity even as overall dimensions are reduced.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes geometric parameters of the gate extension, particularly the width of different portions, to control electrical properties. By adjusting the width of gate extension portions and using selective filling, the invention maintains appropriate resistance and capacitance values even when node sizes are decreased, thereby preserving electrical integrity at higher densities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If gate extension is made continuous to maintain electrical connection, then conductivity is improved, but electrical isolation between adjacent gates becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrical conductivity of gateVSAvoidelectrical isolation between adjacent gates
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts or removes conductive material from specific regions of the gate extension where adjacent gates would otherwise be electrically connected. By creating gaps or filling certain portions with dielectric material, the invention maintains continuity within each gate structure while providing necessary isolation between adjacent gates, thus resolving the contradiction between conductivity and isolation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS20250194197A1Gate tie-down to backside power rail
Publication Date: 2025.06.12 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US20250194197A1 patent drawing
  • US20250194197A1 patent drawing
  • US20250194197A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A semiconductor device includes a gate metal and a gate extension disposed within a region between two transistors of opposite conductivity and connected to the gate metal. The gate extension extends toward a side of the semiconductor device having power rails. A gate cut is disposed within the gate metal and through the gate extension to cut the gate extension into portions that are electrically isolated from each other. Each of the portions of the gate extension is coupled to a backside power rail.