Gateway IPv6 Encapsulation for Wireless Mesh Routing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing network technologies face challenges in providing efficient two-way communication between utility devices and home devices in RF networks, particularly in traversing IPv4 WAN clouds, where IPv6 packets need to be encapsulated and routed effectively across wireless LANs and WANs.

Innovation Solution

A routing scheme and protocols are implemented in RF networks operating in FHSS mode, using a Gateway to encapsulate IPv6 packets into IPv4 for transmission, allowing devices to establish direct radio transmission paths and register with Gateways for optimal routing, ensuring bi-directional connectivity with minimal latency and network reliability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If IPv6 packets are encapsulated in IPv4 for transmission through WAN cloud, then compatibility with existing IPv4 infrastructure is improved, but packet transmission complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveIPv4 infrastructure compatibilityVSAvoidpacket transmission complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements IPv6 packet encapsulation within IPv4 packets, allowing IPv6 traffic to traverse IPv4 WAN infrastructure. The Gateway device maintains dual capability to handle both IPv4 and IPv6 protocols, nesting IPv6 packets inside IPv4 envelopes for transmission through the WAN cloud, thereby achieving backward compatibility while supporting next-generation protocols

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The Gateway serves as an intermediary device between the IPv6 wireless LAN and IPv4 WAN infrastructure. It performs protocol translation and encapsulation, mediating communication between devices using different IP versions. The Gateway receives IPv6 packets from the wireless network, encapsulates them in IPv4 format, and transmits them through the IPv4 WAN cloud to the utility server

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If nodes discover networks and register with multiple Gateways for multi-egress capability, then network reliability is improved, but routing algorithm complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork reliabilityVSAvoidrouting algorithm complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The routing protocol implements dynamic route selection where nodes continuously discover available networks and Gateways, maintaining multiple potential egress paths. Nodes can dynamically switch between different Gateways based on current network conditions, link quality, and Gateway availability, providing resilience against failures while adapting to changing network topologies

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Nodes perform preliminary network discovery and Gateway registration before actual data transmission begins. During this initial phase, nodes identify multiple viable Gateways and establish routing relationships, preparing backup paths in advance. This preliminary action ensures that when transmission begins, multiple egress routes are already established, improving reliability without requiring complex real-time routing decisions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS7969889B2Route and link evaluation in wireless mesh communications networks
Publication Date: 2011.06.28 ITRON NETWORKED SOLUTIONS INC
  • US7969889B2 patent drawing
  • US7969889B2 patent drawing
  • US7969889B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems for providing a network and routing protocol for utility services are disclosed. A method includes discovering a utility network. Neighboring nodes are discovered and the node listens for advertised routes for networks from the neighbors. The node is then registered with one or more utility networks, receiving a unique address for each network registration. Each upstream node can independently make forwarding decisions on both upstream and downstream packets, i.e., choose the next hop according to the best information available to it. The node can sense transient link problems, outage problems and traffic characteristics. Information is used to find the best route out of and within each network. Each network node maintains multi-egress, multi-ingress network routing options both for itself and the node(s) associated with it. The node is capable of several route maintenance functions utilizing the basic routing protocol and algorithms.