Gaussian Process Batch Selection with Hallucinated Observations

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for selecting input data for parallel evaluation struggle to balance exploration and exploitation effectively, especially in scenarios with costly experiments and delayed feedback, leading to suboptimal results and increased cumulative regret.

Innovation Solution

A system that models the function as a Gaussian process, uses upper confidence bounds to select input data for parallel evaluation, and hallucinates intermediate observations to guide decision-making, allowing for efficient batch selection without relying on previous evaluation outputs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If sequential experimentation is used to balance exploration and exploitation, then decision accuracy is improved, but time consumption increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecision accuracyVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-selects a batch of input data points before parallel evaluation based on upper confidence bound calculations. This preliminary selection ensures that even though results arrive simultaneously without intermediate feedback, the chosen points are optimally balanced for both exploration and exploitation, achieving sequential-like decision accuracy in parallel execution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The upper confidence bound calculation serves as an intermediary mechanism that translates uncertain function evaluations into actionable batch selections. By computing UCB values that incorporate both exploration potential and exploitation promise, the system mediates between the competing goals without requiring intermediate feedback during parallel execution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If parallel batch evaluation is implemented to increase processing speed, then productivity is improved, but decision quality deteriorates due to lack of intermediate feedback

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoiddecision quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary batch selection using upper confidence bound calculations before parallel evaluation begins. This pre-computation of optimal batch members ensures that decision quality is maintained despite the absence of intermediate feedback during parallel execution, as the batch is carefully constructed to balance exploration and exploitation objectives.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a virtual model of the evaluation process through upper confidence bound calculations, allowing batch selection to be made based on predicted outcomes rather than actual intermediate results. This copying of the decision-making process enables parallel execution without sacrificing decision quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Loss of time

If batch size is increased to improve parallelism and reduce time, then time efficiency is improved, but cumulative regret increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetime efficiencyVSAvoidcumulative regret
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the batch size parameter based on the upper confidence bound calculations and exploration-exploitation balance requirements. By changing the batch size parameter adaptively rather than using a fixed large batch, the system maintains time efficiency while controlling cumulative regret through mathematically grounded selection criteria.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system selects a partial batch of input data points that are most promising according to upper confidence bound calculations, rather than evaluating all possible points in parallel. This partial action approach achieves good parallelism and time efficiency while maintaining decision quality and controlling cumulative regret by focusing computational resources on the most valuable subset.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS9342786B2Method and system for parallel batch processing of data sets using Gaussian process with batch upper confidence bound
Publication Date: 2016.05.17 CALIFORNIA INST OF TECH
  • US9342786B2 patent drawing
  • US9342786B2 patent drawing
  • US9342786B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and system for selecting a batch of input data from available input data for parallel evaluation by a function is disclosed. The function is modeled as drawn from a Gaussian process. Observations are used to determine a mean and a variance of the modeled function. An upper confidence bound is determined from the determined mean and variance. A decision rule is applied to select input data from the available input data to add to the batch of input data. The selection of the input data is based on a domain-specific time varying parameter. Intermediate observations are hallucinated within the batch. The hallucinated observations are used with the decision rule to select subsequent input data from the available input data for the batch of input data. The input data of the batch is evaluated in parallel with the function. The resulting determined data outputs are stored.