Gaussian Process Wafer Map Generation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for generating wafer maps in semiconductor manufacturing are time-consuming due to the need for extensive measurements, which slows down the manufacturing process and limits the ability to quickly identify post-step errors or non-uniformities.

Innovation Solution

The use of a squared exponential Gaussian process model to generate and present a map of a semiconductor wafer's attributes by calculating non-measured data points based on model parameters and correlation models, reducing the need for extensive measurements and improving data interpolation accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional measurement methods (atomic force microscope, scanning electron microscope) are used to map substrate attributes, then measurement precision is improved, but measurement time increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesubstrate attribute measurement precisionVSAvoidmeasurement time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a computational model (copy) of the substrate attribute distribution based on limited measured data points. This model serves as a virtual replica that can be processed and analyzed without requiring exhaustive physical measurements across the entire substrate surface, thereby reducing measurement time while maintaining precision through the accuracy of the computational model.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces time-consuming mechanical measurement processes (atomic force microscopy, scanning electron microscopy) with computational methods. By using iterative calculations and optimization algorithms on a computer system, the patent substitutes physical measurement mechanisms with mathematical models that can rapidly generate comprehensive substrate maps from sparse data points.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Loss of time

If a limited set of data points is used for wafer mapping, then measurement time is reduced, but manufacturing precision deteriorates due to insufficient data coverage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement cycle timeVSAvoidsubstrate attribute mapping precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an iterative computational model as an intermediary between limited measured data points and the complete substrate attribute map. This intermediary process fills in the gaps between sparse measurements by calculating non-measured attribute data points through iterative optimization, thereby achieving high-precision mapping without requiring dense measurement sampling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the problem from directly measuring all substrate points to measuring a subset and computationally deriving the rest. By changing the approach from exhaustive physical measurement to selective measurement combined with computational inference, the patent maintains manufacturing precision while reducing measurement cycle time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If exhaustive measurements are performed across the entire substrate, then manufacturing precision is improved, but productivity decreases due to extended cycle time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesubstrate attribute mapping accuracyVSAvoidmanufacturing cycle speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential measured data points needed to create an accurate computational model, rather than performing exhaustive measurements. By taking out just the necessary measurements and using iterative calculations to derive the remaining information, the patent achieves high manufacturing precision while maintaining fast productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Ease of operation

If conventional spline interpolation is used to estimate values between measured points, then ease of operation is improved, but measurement precision deteriorates due to radial approximation errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemap generation simplicityVSAvoidinterpolated attribute accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces static spline interpolation with dynamic iterative optimization. Instead of using fixed radial approximation methods, the system continuously refines the estimated values by iteratively calculating non-measured attribute data points based on the measured data and optimization criteria, thereby improving measurement precision while maintaining computational tractability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS10503850B2Generation of a map of a substrate using iterative calculations of non-measured attribute data
Publication Date: 2019.12.10 TOKYO ELECTRON LTD
  • US10503850B2 patent drawing
  • US10503850B2 patent drawing
  • US10503850B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Described herein are technologies to facilitate the generation and presentation of a map of an attribute of a substrate, such as a semiconductor wafer. Using the data of measured attribute (e.g., thickness, temperature, etc.) of a substrate, one or more of the described implementations generate data of non-measured (i.e., calculated) attributes to complete a map of the substrate using model parameters and a correlations model, such as a squared exponential Gaussian process model.