Gaze Calibration Using Explicit and Implicit Phases

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing gaze trackers require frequent calibration, which can be disruptive and inaccurate, especially when users move or ambient conditions change, making them cumbersome or distracting.

Innovation Solution

A combination of explicit and implicit calibration methods is used, where explicit calibration involves user manual input and gaze measurements, and implicit calibration occurs in the background during normal activities, with calibration data stored in buffers to control switching between phases.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If explicit calibration is used, then calibration accuracy is improved, but user disruption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalibration accuracyVSAvoiduser disruption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The calibration process is divided into two distinct phases: explicit calibration phase for high accuracy and implicit calibration phase for background operation. This segmentation allows the system to maintain high calibration accuracy when needed while performing calibration operations in the background during normal user activities, thus reducing user disruption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs implicit calibration in the background during normal user activities before explicit calibration is needed. This preliminary action continuously updates calibration data without disrupting the user, and when explicit calibration is required, the system can quickly transition to the explicit calibration phase using pre-collected data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If frequent calibration is performed, then calibration accuracy is maintained, but productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalibration accuracyVSAvoidwork disruption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The implicit calibration phase operates continuously in the background during normal user activities, maintaining calibration accuracy without interrupting productivity. The system continuously collects calibration data during mouse movements, window focus changes, and other user interactions, ensuring calibration remains up-to-date without requiring dedicated calibration time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-calibration through implicit calibration during normal operations, automatically updating calibration parameters based on user behavior patterns. This eliminates the need for manual calibration interventions and maintains calibration accuracy while users continue their productive activities uninterrupted.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of operation

If implicit calibration is used, then user disruption is reduced, but calibration accuracy may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser disruptionVSAvoidcalibration accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges both explicit and implicit calibration phases into a unified calibration system. Implicit calibration handles background calibration during normal activities, while explicit calibration provides high-precision calibration when needed. The combination of both phases ensures both low user disruption and high calibration accuracy are achieved simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from explicit calibration to validate and refine implicit calibration results. When explicit calibration is performed, the system compares the results with implicit calibration data and adjusts the calibration model accordingly. This feedback mechanism ensures that implicit calibration maintains sufficient accuracy while minimizing user disruption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS9727135B2Gaze calibration
Publication Date: 2017.08.08 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • US9727135B2 patent drawing
  • US9727135B2 patent drawing
  • US9727135B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Calibration of gaze tracking equipment is described, for example, in a desktop computing scenario. In various examples, an explicit calibration phase is carried out, optionally followed by an implicit calibration phase. In examples, the explicit calibration phase comprises requesting and receiving user manual input events associated with specified locations and measuring gaze associated with the manual input events. In examples, the implicit calibration phase is carried out without disturbing other activity of a user in the desktop computing environment, such as operating a graphical user interface. In various examples calibration data is stored in a plurality of buffers and used to control switching between explicit and implicit calibration phases.