Chromatography-Mass Spectral RI Calibration Without External Standards

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current chromatographic separation methods in gas chromatography (GC) face inefficiencies due to the need for frequent recalibration using external standards, complexity in handling internal standards, and inaccuracies in multi-ramp temperature programs, which increase analysis time and reduce throughput.

Innovation Solution

A method that self-generates RI standards from the sample analytes, allowing for internal calibration without external standards, and iteratively refines these standards for accurate RI calculation, enhancing identification confidence through spectral library integration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If external calibration standards (n-alkanes) are used for RI calibration, then measurement precision of RI values is improved, but loss of time increases due to frequent recalibration runs

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveRI value accuracyVSAvoidanalysis time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically identifies candidate compounds from the sample itself and uses their spectral data to generate RI calibration standards without requiring external n-alkane standards. The computer system performs spectral library searching and RI calculation automatically, making the calibration process self-service and eliminating manual intervention and separate calibration runs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The calibration method works with any sample containing identifiable compounds, making it universally applicable without requiring specific external standards. The same spectral library searching capability used for compound identification is also used for calibration, allowing one system to serve multiple functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Measurement precision

If internal calibration standards are added to the sample, then measurement precision is improved by minimizing instrument drift errors, but device complexity increases due to additional sample preparation steps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalibration accuracyVSAvoidsample preparation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of requiring the user to add internal standards to the sample, the system automatically identifies compounds within the sample and uses them as calibration references. The computer system performs all calibration operations automatically based on spectral data, eliminating the need for manual standard addition and complex sample preparation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The method extracts calibration information directly from the sample's own components rather than requiring separate standard substances. By using spectral library matching, the system identifies compounds endogenous to the sample and utilizes their known RI values from the library for calibration purposes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Ease of operation

If spectral library searching alone is used for compound identification, then ease of operation is maintained, but measurement precision of identification decreases due to false positives

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveidentification process simplicityVSAvoididentification confidence
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses RI values calculated from retention times as feedback to verify and refine compound identifications. After initial spectral library matching, the calculated RI values are compared against expected values, and compounds are ranked by a combined score that incorporates both spectral match quality and RI agreement, providing feedback that increases identification confidence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The method merges two independent identification approaches—spectral library searching and RI-based identification—into a unified ranking system. Compounds are ranked based on a combination of spectral match scores and RI calculation accuracy, combining the strengths of both methods to achieve more reliable identifications than either method alone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces analysis time, minimizes errors, and improves identification confidence by using self-generated standards for RI calibration, enabling accurate RI calculation even in complex samples and multi-ramp temperature programs, while integrating with spectral library searches for enhanced compound identification.

Implementation Method 1

gas chromatography (GC) with Mass Spectrometry (MS) detection

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMass Spectrometry:

Implementation Method 2

chromatographic separation connected with a spectral detection system such as gas chromatography (GC)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChromatography: Chromatography

Data Source

PatentUS12142471B2Direct and automatic chromatography-mass spectral analysis
Publication Date: 2024.11.12 CERNO BIOSCIENCE LLC
  • US12142471B2 patent drawing
  • US12142471B2 patent drawing
  • US12142471B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method, spectral detection system and computer readable medium for acquiring spectral data for a sample; detecting presence of compounds in a time window; performing a spectral library search using the spectral data from the time window; evaluating the hit list of compounds in each time window and selecting a subset of highly probable compounds; performing a regression analysis between the retention index and the measured retention time for the compounds in the subset; identifying and removing outliers from the subset with large retention index errors; repeating the regression analysis with the outliers removed; calculating the retention index values for all compounds from the entire sample run; comparing the calculated retention index value to that of a possible compound to be identified, and using a retention index match score as an additional metric or filter to additionally assess the likelihood of a possible hit.