Garbage Collection Tracing with Dynamic Focus on Performance Bottlenecks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing garbage collection systems face challenges in efficiently identifying the causes of performance problems without altering program behavior and consuming excessive computational resources.

Innovation Solution

Implementing lightweight monitoring to detect performance problem signals and conduct constrained tracing, collecting specified trace data until a stop trigger occurs, using a designation data structure that specifies a performance problem signal, trace data category, and stop trigger.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If comprehensive trace data collection is performed to diagnose performance problems, then diagnostic accuracy is improved, but computational resource usage increases and program performance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic accuracyVSAvoidcomputational resource usage
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments trace data collection into multiple categories (e.g., garbage collection events, allocation events, finalization events) and selectively collects data from specific categories based on the detected performance problem type. This allows the system to gather sufficient diagnostic information without collecting all possible trace data, thereby reducing computational overhead while maintaining diagnostic accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by enabling trace data collection with different parameters and granularities for different problem scenarios. Instead of uniform comprehensive collection, the system adjusts the depth and scope of tracing locally based on the specific performance issue detected, optimizing resource usage while preserving necessary diagnostic information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Measurement precision

If extensive trace data is collected to diagnose performance problems, then diagnostic accuracy is improved, but the risk of obscuring or compounding problem causes increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic accuracyVSAvoidobscuring or compounding problem causes
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements partial action by collecting trace data selectively based on the detected performance problem type. Rather than continuously collecting all trace data which would excessively impact program performance, the system activates specific tracing categories only when relevant to the detected issue, thereby avoiding the harmful effects of excessive tracing while maintaining sufficient diagnostic capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs periodic action by monitoring performance metrics continuously but activating detailed trace data collection only periodically when performance problems are detected. This approach allows the system to maintain normal operation during healthy states and switch to diagnostic mode only when necessary, reducing the overall impact on program performance while ensuring accurate problem diagnosis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Loss of energy

If lightweight monitoring is used to detect performance problems, then resource overhead is reduced, but the ability to gather sufficient trace data for accurate diagnosis is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemonitoring overheadVSAvoidtrace data sufficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by implementing lightweight monitoring that continuously detects performance problem indicators before detailed trace data collection is activated. This preliminary detection phase uses minimal resources to identify when a performance issue exists, and only then does the system activate more resource-intensive trace collection, ensuring that sufficient diagnostic data is gathered while minimizing overall resource overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback mechanisms where lightweight monitoring continuously provides performance metrics that inform the activation and configuration of trace data collection. Based on the feedback from monitoring data, the system dynamically adjusts the scope and intensity of tracing activities, ensuring that sufficient trace data is collected for accurate diagnosis while maintaining efficient resource utilization through adaptive control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12487922B2Garbage collection lightweight dynamic tracing and analysis
Publication Date: 2025.12.02 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • US12487922B2 patent drawing
  • US12487922B2 patent drawing
  • US12487922B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Some embodiments perform lightweight monitoring for garbage collection (GC) flow events, then perform focused tracing after detecting a performance problem signal. The tracing is focused by constraints which are specified in a designation data structure, including a performance problem signal definition, a corresponding trace data category and a corresponding tracing stop trigger. Tracing is done only in the specified category and only for the specified time period, to reduce or avoid collection of irrelevant trace data and to reduce or avoid changes in program behavior caused by the tracing itself. Some designation data structures also specify a corresponding trace data analysis. In operation, some embodiments dynamically re-focus tracing on an offshoot trace in response to a trace data analysis result obtained while the program is still executing.