GCIB Surface Modification for Bone Implant Biocompatibility

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for modifying the wettability and surface properties of biological materials, such as bone, for improved cellular attachment and tissue formation are limited, particularly in terms of hydrophilicity and charge state modification, and existing technologies may cause damage or undesirable effects on insulating materials.

Innovation Solution

The use of gas cluster ion beam (GCIB) technology and accelerated neutral beam irradiation to modify the surface properties of biological materials, including bone, by increasing hydrophilicity, altering charge states, and controlling the release of natural bone growth factors, while avoiding damage to insulating materials.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional ion beam processing is used to modify surface wettability and charge state, then hydrophilicity and cellular attachment are improved, but damage to insulating materials occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecellular attachmentVSAvoiddamage to insulating materials
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the fundamental parameters of the beam processing by using gas cluster ions instead of conventional single ions, and by controlling the energy and charge state of the beam to achieve surface modification without damaging insulating materials

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces gas cluster ions as an intermediary between the beam source and the biological material surface, where the cluster ions transfer energy and charge in a controlled manner that modifies surface properties while avoiding direct damage to the material

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If surface modification is applied to enhance biocompatibility, then cellular attachment and proliferation are improved, but control over growth factor release is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovebiocompatibilityVSAvoidcontrol over growth factor release
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality modification by creating different surface characteristics in different regions or at different depths, allowing controlled release of growth factors from specific areas while maintaining overall biocompatibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary surface modification before implantation to create a controlled environment that will subsequently regulate growth factor release, allowing the surface to be pre-prepared for specific biological responses

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If beam processing is used to increase hydrophilicity, then wettability is improved, but processing time and energy consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovehydrophilicityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs periodic or pulsed beam processing to achieve surface modification, where the beam is applied in controlled cycles that improve hydrophilicity while reducing overall energy consumption compared to continuous processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent optimizes energy parameters by using gas cluster ions with specific energy levels that achieve effective surface modification with lower total energy input compared to conventional high-energy ion beams

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances cellular attachment, proliferation, and tissue formation on modified surfaces, with controlled pattern processing and delayed release of growth factors, improving biocompatibility and integration of implanted materials.

Implementation Method 1

Gas cluster ion beam (GCIB) irradiation has been used for nano-scale modification of surfaces

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIon beam irradiation: Ion Beam

Implementation Method 2

GCIB has been shown to modify the hydrophilic properties of non-biological material surfaces

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrophilicity modification: Wetting

Implementation Method 3

Preferred beams are gas cluster ion beam and/or accelerated neutral beam derived from an accelerated gas cluster ion beam

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAccelerated neutral beam:

Data Source

PatentUS9808344B2Method for modifying the wettability and other biocompatibility characteristics of a surface of a biological material by the application of beam technology and biological materials made thereby
Publication Date: 2017.11.07 KHOURY JOSEPH
  • US9808344B2 patent drawing
  • US9808344B2 patent drawing
  • US9808344B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of preparing a preformed bone shape for implantation provides irradiating at least a portion of a preformed bone shape by a Neutral Beam derived from a GCIB, and the preformed bone shape so irradiated.