Gear Cutting With Chip Press-In Detection and Corrective Pass

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for machining toothings in gear systems often result in unsatisfactory properties due to chips being pressed into the machined tooth flanks during the final machining pass, leading to defects that are not reliably detected by measurement processes, causing potential noise and failure issues in gear systems.

Innovation Solution

Implementing real-time monitoring during the machining process to detect when a chip is pressed into the tooth flank and automatically performing an additional machining pass to remove the material protrusion using the same toothing tool, ensuring the tooth flank end geometry is not modified and maintaining the desired properties.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If real-time monitoring and additional machining process are implemented to remove pressed-in chips, then reliability of toothings is improved, but machining time increases and becomes inconsistent

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of toothingsVSAvoidmachining time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements real-time monitoring during the machining process that detects when chips are pressed into the tooth flank. Based on this feedback signal, the control system automatically triggers an additional machining pass only when needed, rather than performing it on every workpiece. This selective feedback-based approach improves reliability by eliminating defects while minimizing unnecessary additional machining time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The monitoring system detects chip press-in events during the machining process itself, allowing the additional machining pass to be performed immediately while the workpiece is still in position. This preliminary detection and immediate response eliminates the need for separate post-processing operations and reduces overall time loss compared to detecting defects after machining is complete.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Manufacturing precision

If monitoring is carried out during the machining pass to detect chip press-in events, then manufacturing precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetooth flank end geometryVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The monitoring system utilizes measurement data that is already being collected during the normal machining process to detect chip press-in events. Rather than requiring completely separate monitoring equipment, the system leverages existing sensors and measurement capabilities to identify defects, thereby improving precision without proportionally increasing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The monitoring system detects chip press-in events by analyzing changes in machining parameters such as force, torque, or vibration characteristics during the machining process. By monitoring parameter variations rather than requiring direct visual or physical inspection, the system achieves high manufacturing precision with relatively simple sensing equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If the additional toothing machining process is performed to remove material protrusion, then reliability is improved, but the tooth flank end geometry is at risk of modification

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetooth flank integrityVSAvoidtooth flank end geometry
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The additional machining pass is designed to remove only the localized material protrusion caused by pressed-in chips, while leaving the rest of the tooth flank end geometry unchanged. The monitoring system identifies the specific location of chip press-in events, allowing the additional machining to be targeted precisely at affected areas rather than re-machining the entire tooth flank, thus preserving the intended geometry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The additional machining pass performs a localized removal operation only at the specific locations where chips were pressed in, rather than performing a complete re-machining of the tooth flank. This partial action approach eliminates defects while minimizing interference with the intended tooth flank end geometry, maintaining manufacturing precision while improving reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly improves the reliability of the toothings by eliminating defects directly during machining, reducing the risk of noise and failure in gear systems, although it may increase machining time, the reliability gain offsets this inconsistency.

Implementation Method 1

there is a kind of cold welding or friction welding with the material of the workpiece

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction welding: Friction Welding

Data Source

PatentUS11654497B2Method for cutting a gear and gear-cutting machine
Publication Date: 2023.05.23 GLEASON PFAUTER MASCHFAB
  • US11654497B2 patent drawing
  • US11654497B2 patent drawing
  • US11654497B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for machining a toothing of a workpiece held in a clamping, in which a toothing tool that rotates about its rotational axis and comprises cutting edges is brought into rolling chip-removing machining engagement with the toothing that rotates about its rotational axis, in order to produce a predetermined tooth flank end geometry in one or more machining passes, wherein during the machining pass which produces the tooth flank end geometry, monitoring responsive to the event of a removed chip being pressed into a machined tooth flank of the toothing by means of the rolling machining process is carried out and, if the monitoring responds, an additional toothing machining process that removes the material protrusion on top of the tooth flank end geometry formed by the chip that was pressed in is implemented automatically, which process is carried out in the same clamping of the workpiece and by means of the toothing tool.