Aircraft Landing Gear Door Unlock Sequencing for Latch Failure Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing aircraft landing gear hatch locking systems face challenges in ensuring structural integrity and reliability due to classification as a principal structural element, necessitating stringent design, material, and inspection requirements, which are not adequately addressed by current hydromechanical or electromechanical actuators.

Innovation Solution

A method and device utilizing a dual latching system with two latching boxes and actuators, combined with a control unit and proximity sensors, to staggered unlock sequences and detect hatch opening, ensuring functional integrity of each latching mechanism during deployment and retraction cycles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a single latching box is used to lock the hatch, then the device complexity is reduced, but the reliability is compromised because a single failure can lead to untimely deployment

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereliabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The single latching box is segmented into two separate latching boxes (first latching box and second latching box), each capable of independently locking the hatch. This segmentation allows the system to maintain reliability through redundancy while managing complexity through modular design, where each latching box functions as an independent unit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If stringent design and material requirements are imposed on the latching box to ensure structural integrity, then the reliability is improved, but the ease of manufacture deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidease of manufacture
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

By dividing the latching system into two separate latching boxes, each unit can be manufactured using standard materials and processes without requiring the entire assembly to meet extreme structural requirements. This segmentation allows for easier manufacturing of individual components while maintaining overall system integrity through the redundant configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If visual inspection methods are implemented to detect anomalies in the latching box, then the reliability is improved, but the ease of operation deteriorates due to additional inspection requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanomaly detectionVSAvoidease of operation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The latching system is divided into two accessible latching boxes that can be individually inspected. This segmentation allows maintenance personnel to perform focused visual inspections on each unit separately, making the inspection process more manageable and less cumbersome than inspecting a single complex integrated system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Reliability

If a staggered unlocking sequence is implemented to test latching mechanism functionality, then the reliability is improved, but the loss of time increases due to waiting periods

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunctional integrity verificationVSAvoidloss of time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit is programmed with a predetermined staggered unlocking sequence that activates the first unlocking actuator, waits for a predetermined time period to allow detection of hatch movement, then activates the second unlocking actuator. This preliminary programming of the sequence minimizes the actual time loss by eliminating manual intervention and optimization opportunities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

5Reliability

If detection means are added to detect hatch opening during the waiting period, then the reliability is improved through failure detection, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefailure detectionVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Detection means are incorporated to monitor whether the hatch begins to open during the predetermined waiting period after the first latching box is unlocked. This feedback mechanism provides information about the functional integrity of the second latching box, allowing the system to detect potential failures. The feedback is integrated into the existing control unit, minimizing additional complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP4399149B1Method and device for unlocking a door of an aircraft landing gear
Publication Date: 2026.04.08 SAFRAN LANDING SYSTEMS
  • EP4399149B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4399149B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4399149B1 patent drawingFigure 3A

AI summary

A method for unlocking a door (20) of an aircraft landing gear movably mounted between an open position and a closed position, the door (20) being associated with attachment means comprising a first attachment housing (23.1) and a second attachment housing (23.2) arranged to individually lock the door (20) in the closed position, a first unlocking actuator (22.1) and a second unlocking actuator (22.2) arranged to respectively control the first attachment housing (23.1) and the second attachment housing (23.2) with a view to deactivating them, and means for detecting (40) the door in the closed position, the method comprising the step of sequentially deactivating the attachment housing in order to detect whether the last attachment housing has failed to deactivate. A device and an aircraft using said method.