Gear Tooth Grinding Infeed Adjustment for Uneven Allowance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing method for grinding gear toothing often results in scrap due to uneven pre-machining, where some tooth flanks are not adequately prepared, leading to incomplete material removal and rejection of parts, as the initial machine setting may not account for manufacturing deviations.

Innovation Solution

The method involves measuring the actual allowance on tooth flanks at multiple axial positions to determine the necessary radial infeed of the grinding tool, adjusting it within the tolerance band to ensure material removal on all flanks, thereby adapting to variations in pre-machining quality and preventing scrap.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If a fixed radial infeed corresponding to the nominal value is used for grinding, then the machine setting is simple and consistent, but some tooth flanks with unfavorable pre-machining quality will not be adequately ground, leading to scrap

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachine setting simplicityVSAvoidtooth flank grinding quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The invention measures the actual allowance on tooth flanks at multiple axial positions before grinding. This preliminary measurement action enables determination of whether sufficient material is present for complete grinding, allowing the process to adapt the radial infeed accordingly to ensure all tooth flanks are properly ground.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention dynamically adjusts the radial infeed of the grinding tool based on measured allowance values. Instead of using a fixed nominal infeed, the system adapts the infeed amount according to actual pre-machining quality, ensuring complete material removal on all tooth flanks while maintaining connection to the nominal value for quality control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Manufacturing precision

If the radial infeed is increased to ensure complete material removal on all tooth flanks, then grinding quality improves, but the tolerance band for width of teeth and spherical measure may be exceeded

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetooth flank grinding qualityVSAvoidcompliance with tolerance specifications
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention uses feedback from measured allowance values to determine the appropriate radial infeed. The measured actual allowance on tooth flanks feeds into the control logic that decides whether to use the nominal infeed or an increased infeed, ensuring that tolerance specifications are met while achieving complete grinding where possible.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the radial infeed parameter based on measured conditions. When allowance measurements indicate sufficient material presence, the system increases the radial infeed beyond the nominal value to ensure complete material removal, while still maintaining the final dimensions within the tolerance band through controlled adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If adaptive radial infeed adjustment is implemented based on allowance measurement, then the proportion of good parts increases, but the process complexity and measurement requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproportion of good partsVSAvoidmeasurement and control system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention performs preliminary measurements of the allowance on tooth flanks at multiple axial positions before the grinding operation. This advance measurement enables the system to determine the appropriate radial infeed setting, increasing the proportion of good parts by identifying and addressing insufficient allowance conditions before grinding begins.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention applies different radial infeed values to different local conditions on the gear. By measuring allowance at multiple axial positions and adapting the infeed based on local material presence, the system optimizes grinding for each specific tooth flank condition, thereby increasing the proportion of good parts without requiring complete system redesign.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly increases the proportion of good parts by ensuring all tooth flanks are machined correctly, utilizing the tolerance band to maintain quality and prevent rejections, even in cases where initial settings would fail to produce acceptable parts.

Implementation Method 1

a sensor 3, for example an inductive sensor, records measurement data from which the position of the tooth space can be inferred

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInductive sensing: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

the grinding tool is brought into engagement with the toothing to be ground, whereby the allowance on the tooth flanks before grinding is ground off

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAbrasion: Abrasion

Data Source

PatentUS12023749B2Method for grinding the toothing of a gear
Publication Date: 2024.07.02 KAPP NILES GMBH & CO KG
  • US12023749B2 patent drawing
  • US12023749B2 patent drawing
  • US12023749B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for grinding a gear toothing, in which a target value with a tolerance range is defined for the tooth width. The method includes: a) measuring the location of the surface of the tooth flanks of the gear at least two axial positions offset in the direction of the axis of rotation; b) determining the actually present allowance of the gear based on the measured values determined in step a); c) grinding the toothing by radial infeed of the grinding tool relative to the toothing, c1) wherein the radial infeed corresponds to the target value of the tooth width, if the determination under step b) indicated that such an allowance is present on all tooth flanks that material will be removed from all tooth flanks, or c2) wherein the radial infeed takes place at a value higher than the target value of the tooth width, the higher value still corresponding to the tolerance range for the tooth width, if the determination under step b) indicated that such an allowance is present on all tooth flanks that material will be removed from all tooth flanks only with increased radial infeed.