Gear Hobbing Tool Segmentation for Tooth Width Precision

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for cutting teeth in workpieces are inefficient, as they require the same cutting tools for both roughing and smoothing operations, leading to suboptimal results and tool wear due to mismatched tooth dimensions and burr removal challenges.

Innovation Solution

The method employs a gear wheel-shaped roughing tool with roughing teeth, a roller compression tool for chamfering, and a gear wheel-shaped smoothing tool with differently configured teeth to achieve precise tooth width adjustment, using high cutting power for roughing and low power for smoothing, and synchronizing tool spindles for efficient operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If the same cutting tool is used for both roughing and smoothing operations, then device complexity is reduced, but manufacturing precision deteriorates due to mismatched tooth dimensions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of cutting toolsVSAvoidtooth width precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the tooth cutting process into two separate operations performed by different tools: roughing teeth (with larger width) for initial material removal and smoothing teeth (with precise target width) for final dimensioning. This segmentation allows each tool to be optimized for its specific function, resolving the contradiction between device simplicity and manufacturing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The gear hobbing tool is designed with both roughing teeth and smoothing teeth on the same tool body, enabling it to perform both roughing and smoothing operations sequentially. This multi-functionality maintains device simplicity while achieving precise tooth dimensions through the different tooth configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Productivity

If roughing teeth are used to produce complete tooth depth, then productivity increases, but tool wear accelerates due to excessive cutting depth

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetooth cutting speedVSAvoidtool service life
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The roughing teeth are designed to remove the majority of material (excessive action for roughing) while leaving a small finishing allowance. The smoothing teeth then complete the precise dimensioning. This partial division of cutting depth allows high productivity in roughing while protecting tools from excessive wear by avoiding complete tooth depth removal in one pass.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Productivity

If high feed rate is used in roughing operation, then productivity increases, but manufacturing precision deteriorates due to rough surface finish

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroughing feed rateVSAvoidsurface finish quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The cutting process is segmented into roughing (high feed rate, poor surface finish) and smoothing (low feed rate, high surface finish quality) operations. Different tools with different tooth configurations are used for each stage, allowing the system to achieve both high productivity in roughing and high precision in smoothing without compromise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Manufacturing precision

If tooth width is reduced to target dimension in roughing operation, then manufacturing precision improves, but productivity decreases due to increased number of passes required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetooth width accuracyVSAvoidtooth cutting efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The roughing teeth are deliberately designed with width exceeding the target dimension (excessive action) to remove material rapidly. The smoothing teeth then perform the precise dimensioning to the target width. This approach prioritizes productivity in the roughing stage while maintaining overall precision through the subsequent smoothing operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS8732937B2Apparatus and method for cutting teeth in workpieces and associated tool set
Publication Date: 2014.05.27 PROFILATOR
  • US8732937B2 patent drawing
  • US8732937B2 patent drawing
  • US8732937B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and apparatus for cutting teeth in workpieces, wherein, in a roughing operation, a substantially uncut blank receives rough teeth using a cutting tool having cutting teeth. Operation teeth are produced, the tooth width of which is defined by the spacing between the flanks of the teeth and is greater than the target dimension. In a subsequent deburring operation, a chamfer is incorporated into the end face edge of the tooth flanks, accompanied by the removal of an end face burr. Lastly, in a smoothing operation, the tooth width of the teeth is brought to the target dimension by machining the tooth flanks.