Motor Vehicle Gear Selector Actuation Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for detecting unintentional or improper operation of safety-critical control elements in motor vehicles, such as gear selectors, are either cumbersome or prone to false triggers, often requiring complex optical sensors or additional buttons that compromise user experience and safety.

Innovation Solution

A method utilizing a plurality of sensors, preferably capacitive proximity sensors, on the operating element to record and analyze the chronological sequence of activations, differentiating intended from unintended actuations by passengers, thereby blocking unsafe actions without the need for complex optical detection or additional buttons.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If complex optical sensors with image processing are used to detect unintentional operation, then detection reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection reliabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The detection system is segmented into multiple simple sensors distributed at different positions on the operating element, each detecting local contact events. This segmentation allows the system to achieve reliable detection through distributed sensing rather than relying on a single complex optical system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces complex optical detection systems with simple contact sensors that detect mechanical contact events. This substitution uses basic sensor technology to detect the sequence and position of contacts, achieving reliable detection without the complexity of optical image processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If an additional button is added to the operating element to prevent unintentional actuation, then safety is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidease of operation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces dynamic evaluation of the sensor activation sequence rather than static additional buttons. The system analyzes the temporal and spatial pattern of sensor activations to determine whether the operation is intentional, allowing safe operation without adding physical buttons that would complicate the interface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides feedback by analyzing the sequence of sensor activations and using this information to determine whether to execute the associated action. This feedback mechanism replaces the need for additional physical buttons by using intelligent evaluation of the contact pattern.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If additional sensors are added to detect contact sequence, then detection precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection precisionVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The operating element is divided into multiple sensor zones at different positions, with each zone containing a simple contact sensor. This segmentation provides precise detection of contact location and sequence without requiring complex individual sensors, as the precision comes from the distributed arrangement rather than sensor complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach effectively and simply detects unintended actuations, enhancing safety by preventing unsafe gear changes and improving user comfort by eliminating the need for additional buttons, while using inexpensive sensors for reliable operation.

Implementation Method 1

A plurality of sensors, in particular capacitive proximity sensors, are arranged on the operating element

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapacitance: Capacitance

Data Source

PatentEP2798243B1Method for processing an actuation of an operating element in a motor vehicle
Publication Date: 2019.08.21 BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE AG
  • EP2798243B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2798243B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2798243B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for processing an actuation of an operating element (1) in a motor vehicle, in particular an operating lever, wherein the operating element (1) is actuated at least by the driver of the motor vehicle, and a plurality of sensors (S1, S2, S3, S4), which are activated at least in part in the event of an actuation of the operating element (1), are arranged on the operating element (1). The method according to the invention is characterized in that the temporal order of activation of the sensors (S1, S2, S3, S4) during actuation of the operating element (1) is detected and, on the basis of the temporal order, it is determined whether the actuation is undesired, undesired actuations comprising unintended actuations and/or actuations by a passenger. The execution of one or a plurality of actions in the motor vehicle that are coupled to the actuation of the operating element (1) is blocked in the event of an undesired actuation.