Gear Tooth Rolling with Dual Shaping Tools for Fatigue Strength

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for enhancing the fatigue strength of toothing in gear wheels, such as shot blasting and hydrostatic pressing, are complex and result in low productivity or surface roughness, failing to effectively induce compressive residual stresses.

Innovation Solution

A rolling device with multiple shaping tools, including rollers and sliding elements, is used to induce compressive residual stresses and improve surface quality, allowing for guided movement to process gear wheels efficiently, especially in mass production.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If shot blasting is used to induce compressive residual stresses, then fatigue strength of toothings is improved, but surface smoothness deteriorates and process complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefatigue strengthVSAvoidsurface smoothness
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the shot blasting process (which uses discrete particles) with a rolling process using continuous cylindrical tools. The rolling tools apply controlled mechanical pressure through rotation, inducing compressive residual stresses without the random impact of shot blasting, thereby maintaining surface smoothness while improving fatigue strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the fundamental parameter of the processing method from particle impact (shot blasting) to controlled rolling pressure. By adjusting rolling force, rotation speed, and tool geometry, the process achieves compressive residual stress induction with controlled surface quality, resolving the contradiction between strength improvement and surface smoothness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If a single shaping tool is used, then device complexity is reduced, but productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidnumber of shaping tools
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the work piece processing into multiple independent shaping tools, each responsible for specific tooth flanks. This segmentation allows parallel processing of multiple features simultaneously, increasing overall productivity while keeping each individual tool relatively simple in design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines multiple shaping tools into a single integrated device structure with common support and control mechanisms. This merging approach enables simultaneous operation of multiple tools on different tooth flanks, achieving high productivity without proportionally increasing device complexity, as shared components reduce the net complexity increase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Strength

If hydrostatic pressing with high liquid pressure is used, then compressive residual stresses are induced, but device complexity increases due to extreme pressure requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompressive residual stressesVSAvoidpressure system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the hydrostatic pressing system (which requires complex high-pressure liquid delivery infrastructure) with a direct mechanical rolling system. The rolling tools transmit force through controlled rotation and mechanical contact, achieving comparable or superior compressive residual stresses without the infrastructure complexity of extreme pressure hydraulic systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the static high-pressure application of hydrostatic pressing into a dynamic rolling process. The rolling tools apply varying pressure through rotation, allowing controlled stress induction through motion rather than requiring sustained extreme static pressure, thereby simplifying the overall system while achieving the desired residual stress state.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enables quick and effective processing of gear wheels with improved wear resistance and surface quality, enhancing the fatigue strength of toothing while maintaining minimal thickness change.

Implementation Method 1

induce compressive residual stresses into a cylindrical external surface of a component

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompressive residual stresses: Compression

Implementation Method 2

a first shaping tool and at least a second shaping tool are moved jointly and in a guided way relative to the work piece

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS11638981B2Rolling device for rolling work pieces having a toothing, and associated method
Publication Date: 2023.05.02 ECOROLL WERKZEUGTECHN
  • US11638981B2 patent drawing
  • US11638981B2 patent drawing
  • US11638981B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A rolling device for work pieces with toothing, in particular gear wheels, includes first and second shaping tools which are guided by a guide relative to the work pieces. With respect to the work pieces, a first region of a tooth flank is shaped with the first shaping tool and a second region of the tooth flank is shaped by the second shaping tool. The first and second shaping tools are respectively mounted on first and second rollers. The second roller has an axial thickness on the circumference, which differs from the axial thickness of the first roller such that the second region of the tooth flank is different from the first region.