Gearbox Control Method for Seamless Shifting Without Torque Interruption

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current gearbox technologies face challenges in shifting gears without torque interruption, leading to increased wear, noise, and reduced acceleration, particularly in heavy vehicles, while also requiring a compact design to accommodate multiple gear steps and high forces.

Innovation Solution

A method for controlling a gearbox that shifts gears in two steps, synchronizing speed and torque between splitter and main shafts using synchronizing elements and axially displacing coupling sleeves, allowing for seamless gear changes without torque interruption and reducing component wear, noise, and enhancing vehicle acceleration, while achieving a compact design with low weight and cost.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If synchronization devices are enlarged to transmit large torque, then torque transmission capability is improved, but weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetorque transmission capabilityVSAvoidweight of synchronization devices
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the synchronization function from traditional friction-based synchronization devices and relocates it to the control system. The control system commands the coupling sleeve to axially displace only after speed synchronization is achieved, eliminating the need for enlarged mechanical synchronization devices while maintaining torque transmission capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The control system acts as an intermediary between the planetary gear and the coupling sleeve. It monitors speed synchronization and coordinates the axial displacement of the coupling sleeve, enabling smooth gear shifts without requiring enlarged mechanical synchronization components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Force

If synchronization devices are enlarged to transmit large torque, then torque transmission capability is improved, but space requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetorque transmission capabilityVSAvoidspace requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The synchronization function is extracted from physical synchronization devices and transferred to the control system. This eliminates the need for enlarged mechanical components, reducing space requirements while maintaining the ability to handle large torque transmissions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical synchronization system with a control-based system. The control system monitors speed and coordinates coupling sleeve displacement, substituting mechanical synchronization devices with electronic control while reducing space requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Force

If synchronization devices are enlarged to transmit large torque, then torque transmission capability is improved, but moment of inertia increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetorque transmission capabilityVSAvoidmoment of inertia
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The synchronization function is extracted from heavy mechanical devices and relocated to the control system. This eliminates the need for enlarged components with high moment of inertia, allowing the coupling sleeve to accelerate and decelerate more rapidly while maintaining torque transmission capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The mechanical synchronization system is replaced with a control-based system that monitors speed and coordinates coupling sleeve displacement. This substitution reduces the moment of inertia by eliminating heavy mechanical synchronization components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Power

If traditional gear shifting is used, then gear ratio change is achieved, but torque interruption occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegear ratio changeVSAvoidtorque interruption
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The control system performs preliminary actions by monitoring speed synchronization before commanding the coupling sleeve to axially displace. This preliminary speed synchronization ensures that gear shifting occurs without torque interruption, maintaining continuous power transmission.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The control system uses feedback by monitoring the speed of the planetary gear and the coupling sleeve. Based on this feedback, the control system determines when speed synchronization is achieved and commands the coupling sleeve to displace, enabling seamless gear shifts without torque interruption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

5Speed

If traditional synchronization devices are used, then speed synchronization is achieved, but wear increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed synchronizationVSAvoidcomponent wear
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical friction-based synchronization devices with a control-based system. The control system monitors speed and coordinates coupling sleeve displacement, eliminating the wear associated with traditional mechanical synchronization while maintaining speed synchronization capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The control system acts as an intermediary that monitors speed synchronization and coordinates the timing of coupling sleeve displacement. This eliminates direct mechanical contact and friction between synchronization components, reducing wear and improving reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

6Adaptability or versatility

If multiple gear steps are accommodated, then gear ratio range is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegear ratio rangeVSAvoidgearbox structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system provides multi-functionality by handling speed monitoring, synchronization determination, and coupling sleeve displacement coordination. This universal control approach simplifies the overall gearbox structure while maintaining the capability to accommodate multiple gear steps and a wide gear ratio range.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces complex mechanical synchronization devices with a control-based system. This substitution reduces device complexity while maintaining the ability to accommodate multiple gear steps and provide a wide gear ratio range through coordinated control of the coupling sleeve.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS10641385B2Method for controlling a gearbox, a gearbox and a vehicle provided with such a gearbox
Publication Date: 2020.05.05 SCANIA CV AB
  • US10641385B2 patent drawing
  • US10641385B2 patent drawing
  • US10641385B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for controlling a gearbox (2) that includes a main gearbox (6) provided with a splitter shaft (16) and a main shaft (14), connectable to a power source (4). The splitter shaft (16) is connected to a lay shaft (22) by at least a first and a second splitter gear pair (42, 45). The main shaft (14) is connected to a lay shaft (22) by at least a first gear pair (60). The method includes a) preparing a shifting of gear in the gearbox (2) by transferring essentially the same speed and torque between the splitter and the main shafts (16, 14), and b) shifting gear in the gearbox (2).