Geared Hand Tool With Variable Leverage for One-Hand Cutting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

One-hand operated cutting tools face challenges in delivering high cutting force due to the user's hand position, leading to smaller cutting strokes and increased fatigue, as the mechanical advantage is limited when handles are maximally spaced.

Innovation Solution

A hand tool with a variable mechanical advantage system, featuring a lever and jaws with non-circular bearing surfaces that provide maximum mechanical advantage at the full open position and minimum at the full close position, utilizing rolling contact and gear engagement to enhance cutting force and reduce user fatigue.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the handles of a one-hand operated cutting tool are maximally spaced to allow user hand placement, then the user's hand can be positioned for operation, but the user cannot deliver high squeezing force to close the jaws, resulting in reduced cutting effectiveness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehand positioningVSAvoidsqueezing force
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies a variable mechanical advantage system where the mechanical advantage changes dynamically throughout the cutting stroke. The bearing surfaces are non-circular (elliptical) so that mechanical advantage is maximum when handles are maximally spaced (full open position) and minimum when handles are closely spaced (full close position). This dynamic adjustment allows users to deliver maximum squeezing force when handles are spread for comfortable hand positioning, while still achieving effective cutting force when handles close together.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If the handles are maximally spaced for comfortable hand positioning, then ease of operation is improved, but the cutting stroke length is reduced requiring additional strokes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehand positioning comfortVSAvoidcutting stroke length
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The variable mechanical advantage system with non-circular bearing surfaces enables the tool to maintain high mechanical advantage throughout a larger portion of the cutting stroke. By maximizing mechanical advantage at the full open position and maintaining effective force transmission through the stroke, the tool achieves longer effective cut lengths per stroke, reducing the number of strokes needed and improving productivity while preserving comfortable hand positioning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Device complexity

If conventional fixed mechanical advantage design is used, then the structure is simple, but user fatigue and muscle strain increase due to inability to deliver sufficient force

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical structureVSAvoiduser fatigue
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a variable mechanical advantage system using non-circular (elliptical) bearing surfaces that adapt the mechanical advantage to the user's needs throughout the cutting stroke. This dynamic system maximizes mechanical advantage when handles are spread for comfortable hand positioning, enabling users to deliver sufficient squeezing force without fatigue or strain. While the structure is more complex than fixed mechanical advantage designs, the complexity is justified by the significant improvement in user comfort and reduction in fatigue.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The tool increases cutting force at the full open position, allowing for longer cut lengths with less user effort, reducing fatigue and improving ease of use by matching hand strength characteristics throughout the cutting stroke.

Implementation Method 1

the first and second bearing surfaces are in rolling contact

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRolling contact: Roller

Implementation Method 2

the first and second sets of projections are at least partially engaged

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGear engagement: Gear

Data Source

PatentUS11122746B2Geared hand tool
Publication Date: 2021.09.21 FISKARS FINLAND OY AB
  • US11122746B2 patent drawing
  • US11122746B2 patent drawing
  • US11122746B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A hand tool includes a first jaw; a second jaw rotatably coupled to the first jaw, the second jaw including a first set of projections and a first bearing surface, the first bearing surface having a first curvature; and a lever coupled to the first jaw, the lever including a second set of projections and a second bearing surface, the second bearing surface having a second curvature. During a movement of the first and second jaws from a full open position to a full close position, the first and second sets of projections are at least partially engaged to prevent a slippage between the first and second bearing surfaces that are in a rolling contact during the movement of the first and second jaws from the full open position to the full close position.