Isocyanate-Free Gel Binder for Masonry Assembly

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional masonry construction methods using mortar or polyurethane foam face challenges such as long preparation and drying times, sensitivity to weather conditions, and the use of toxic isocyanates, which limit their effectiveness and safety.

Innovation Solution

A method employing a binder in the form of a gel or putty free from isocyanates, encapsulated in a protective film that maintains its integrity and releases upon contact, allowing for quick and safe assembly under various conditions without the need for immediate placement, providing enhanced adhesion and mechanical properties.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If polyurethane foam binder is used, then application is easier and drying time is reduced, but retraction is rapid reducing bonding power and elements must be placed immediately

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrying timeVSAvoidbonding power
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the physical and chemical parameters of the binder by using a gel-based composition with specific viscosity ranges (50-5000 Pa.s) and controlled retraction rates (0.1-5 mm/min), replacing the rapid-setting polyurethane foam. This allows extended working time while maintaining bonding effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses a composite gel binder system combining water, thickening agents, adhesion promoters, and optional polymeric materials to create a binder with balanced properties - sufficient retraction for bonding but controlled enough to maintain adhesive strength during assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Ease of operation

If polyurethane foam binder is used, then application is easier, but in windy weather the foam does not remain in place and gluing becomes impossible

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplication easeVSAvoidweather resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The gel binder's viscosity parameters (50-5000 Pa.s) and controlled retraction rate (0.1-5 mm/min) provide resistance to wind and environmental factors while maintaining ease of application, unlike volatile polyurethane foam that cannot remain in place under windy conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The gel binder's inherent viscosity and adhesion properties provide a cushioning effect that prevents the binder from being blown away or degraded by weather conditions before the elements are assembled, ensuring reliable bonding regardless of external conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Productivity

If polyurethane foam is used, then binding speed is improved, but isocyanates are released which are toxic and reactive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly speedVSAvoidisocyanate release
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts and removes the harmful isocyanate component from the binder system entirely, using a water-based gel composition with thickening agents and adhesion promoters that provides equivalent bonding performance without toxic byproducts or vapor release.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the potential harm of rapid setting (which causes isocyanate release issues) into a benefit by using a gel system that sets at a controlled rate, maintaining productivity while eliminating the toxic release problem through fundamentally different chemistry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

4Strength

If traditional mortar is used, then structural strength is achieved, but preparation time is long (about 1 hour) and drying time is extended (7 to 28 days)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidpreparation and drying time
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The gel binder achieves structural strength comparable to traditional mortar but with dramatically reduced preparation time (no mixing required) and drying time (controlled retraction within minutes rather than weeks), due to its pre-mixed gel formulation and controlled evaporation rate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces the mechanical mixing and prolonged curing process of traditional mortar with a pre-formulated gel system that requires only application and controlled retraction, eliminating the need for extensive preparation and waiting time while maintaining structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables non-toxic, efficient, and durable masonry assembly with reduced shrinkage and creep, allowing for flexible installation times and improved performance over traditional binders, while avoiding the hazards associated with isocyanates.

Implementation Method 1

when it is applied to the first construction element and in contact with air, a protective film encapsulating the composition of said binder can form

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFilm formation: Coatings

Implementation Method 2

at least a first construction element and at least a second construction element bonded to each other by a binder

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdhesion: Adhesive

Data Source

PatentEP3290608B1Method for assembling a construction assembly and associated construction assembly
Publication Date: 2021.05.12 BOUYER LEROUX
  • EP3290608B1 patent drawingFigure 1A~6B
  • EP3290608B1 patent drawingFigure 7~12
  • EP3290608B1 patent drawingFigure 13~21

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for assembling a building assembly (100) comprising at least one first building element (1) and at least one second building element (2) bonded to each other by a binder (3), said assembly method comprising the following steps: - supply of the first building element, - supply of the binder, - application of the binder to at least a portion of a surface of the first building element intended to be in contact with the second building element of the building assembly, the binder being in the form of a gel or a sealant, said binder having a composition free of isocyanates or free of reactive isocyanates, - supply of the second building element,- bringing the bonded surface of the first building element into contact with at least a portion of a surface of the second building element so that the bonding agent is at least partially arranged between the first and second building elements, - joining the two building elements by applying pressure.