Generative AI Opportunity Assessment Tool for Workforce Integration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Companies face challenges in integrating Generative AI due to the need for significant effort and data to identify a suitable integration path, with solutions often not applicable across different industries or entities of varying sizes and resources.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented system and method that implements a Generative AI Opportunity Assessment Tool, which includes an input to access workforce data, an interactive user interface, and a processor configured to identify target entities, generate baseline assessments, align role profiles with a taxonomy, and determine workforce capacity opportunities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If companies conduct comprehensive assessments to identify suitable Generative AI integration paths, then the accuracy and applicability of integration strategies improve, but the time and resources required for assessment increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassessment accuracyVSAvoidassessment time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-processing and normalizing workforce data, pre-defining role profiles, and pre-assessing Generative AI readiness before the actual integration planning. This preliminary assessment framework is established in advance, allowing organizations to quickly evaluate their readiness without conducting lengthy ad-hoc analyses each time they consider Generative AI integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters by transforming raw workforce data into standardized metrics, converting role descriptions into structured role profiles with defined attributes, and translating organizational characteristics into readiness scores. These parameter transformations enable efficient comparison and assessment without requiring extensive manual analysis of each organization's unique data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If organizations customize Generative AI integration strategies for their specific industry and size, then the applicability and effectiveness improve, but the complexity of implementation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestrategy applicabilityVSAvoidimplementation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the integration strategy into distinct components: workforce data assessment, role profile analysis, readiness evaluation, and integration roadmap development. Each component can be independently configured and implemented based on organizational needs, allowing customization without requiring complete redesign of the entire integration process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides universal role profiles and assessment frameworks that can be applied across different industries and organization sizes. The standardized role profiles serve multiple functions by capturing essential job characteristics that are relevant regardless of industry, while allowing customization of weights and thresholds to adapt to specific organizational contexts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of operation

If companies use standardized Generative AI solutions, then the ease of implementation improves, but the fit for specific organizational needs deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplementation easeVSAvoidorganizational fit
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamic role profiles that can be adjusted based on organizational characteristics. The role profiles contain configurable parameters such as weights for different job attributes, thresholds for readiness assessment, and prioritization criteria for integration priorities. These dynamic settings allow the standardized framework to adapt to specific organizational needs while maintaining the ease of implementation provided by the structured approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Measurement precision

If organizations conduct detailed workforce analysis to determine Generative AI impact, then the precision of productivity estimates improves, but the data processing requirements and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproductivity estimate accuracyVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the essential data elements needed for Generative AI impact assessment from the organization's workforce data. Instead of analyzing all available workforce information, the system identifies and extracts key parameters such as role descriptions, task compositions, and skill requirements. This selective extraction reduces data processing complexity while maintaining the precision needed for accurate productivity estimates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS20250156780A1System and method for implementing a generative ai rapid assessment tool
Publication Date: 2025.05.15 KPMG LLP
  • US20250156780A1 patent drawing
  • US20250156780A1 patent drawing
  • US20250156780A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An embodiment of the present invention is directed to a Generative AI Rapid Assessment Tool that provides core analytic outcomes relating to value; focus, readiness and urgency. An embodiment of the present invention aims to assess company-specific Gen AI opportunity. This is curated using industry and function-oriented Gen AI use-cases, industry impact expectations, and company-insights, derived by analysis third-party data to calculate potential value. An embodiment of the present invention then narrows the field of opportunity value. Analysis is completed at the function, sub-function and use-case/activity levels to suggest where there may be the greatest area of opportunity. This helps mitigate the need to focus attention and resources throughout the entire business, and address identified priority areas.