Gene Prioritization With Literature-Validated LLM Profiling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional methods for interpreting large-scale gene profiling data lack nuanced biological context and fail to systematically validate LLM predictions, leading to inefficiencies in identifying therapeutic targets.

Innovation Solution

A two-stage computational framework combining LLM-based screening with literature validation for systematic gene prioritization, using a multi-criteria evaluation and retrieval-augmented generation to align LLM predictions with literature evidence.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If LLM-based screening is used for gene prioritization, then processing efficiency and speed are improved, but reliability and accuracy deteriorate due to hallucination and lack of systematic validation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing efficiencyVSAvoidprediction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary validation layer between the LLM screening and final gene prioritization. This intermediary component systematically validates LLM predictions against multiple data sources including literature databases, experimental data, and expert knowledge, thereby maintaining the high processing efficiency of LLMs while improving reliability through structured verification

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where LLM predictions are systematically validated and the results are fed back to improve future predictions. The validation process includes cross-checking against known gene databases, literature evidence, and experimental data, creating a closed-loop system that continuously improves accuracy while maintaining efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If traditional ontology or pathway enrichment methods are used, then ease of operation is improved, but measurement precision and biological context understanding deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemethod simplicityVSAvoidbiological context understanding
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple information sources and validation methods into a composite analytical framework. It integrates ontology-based approaches with literature mining, experimental data, and expert knowledge systems, creating a multi-layered validation structure that maintains operational simplicity while dramatically improving biological context understanding through diverse data integration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Reliability

If comprehensive literature validation is performed, then reliability is improved, but loss of time and processing duration worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalidation accuracyVSAvoidvalidation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary actions by pre-processing and organizing validation data sources before the actual gene prioritization task. Literature databases, experimental data, and expert knowledge are pre-structured and indexed, enabling rapid validation during the actual prioritization process without sacrificing comprehensive validation coverage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the validation process into multiple independent modules that can operate in parallel. Different validation checks (literature search, database cross-reference, expert knowledge verification) are divided into separate computational modules, reducing overall validation time through concurrent processing while maintaining comprehensive reliability checks

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20260057962A1Gene Profiling and Candidate Gene Prioritization Using Large Language Models
Publication Date: 2026.02.26 JACKSON LAB THE
  • US20260057962A1 patent drawing
  • US20260057962A1 patent drawing
  • US20260057962A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to a multi-phase method for determining a set of candidate genes. During a first phase, the method includes prompting a naïve language model with a plurality of prompts corresponding to a plurality of candidate genes to generate a set of initial scores indicative of each corresponding candidate gene's potential as a biomarker or therapeutic target. During a second phase, the method includes determining, for each candidate gene, a set of relevant documents from a curated document library. The method also includes prompting a further language model using the relevant documents to generate secondary scores. During a third phase, the method includes determining, for each candidate gene, at least one of: a decision classification, a recalibrated score, and a detailed scientific explanation. The method includes determining a final candidate set and conducting a multi-dimensional optimization analysis on each candidate gene of the final candidate set.