Generative AI for Building Equipment Service Recommendations

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing building management systems face challenges in generating precise data for equipment servicing due to limitations in existing AI and machine learning models, which often produce incorrect, imprecise, or irrelevant data, requiring manual input adjustments and struggling with large datasets and unstructured data processing.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of generative AI models, such as language models and neural networks, to generate and fine-tune data pairs from service and warranty records, creating question-and-answer pairs for precise service recommendations and reports, and integrating these models with feedback loops for improved accuracy and relevance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If existing AI and machine learning models are used to generate service data, then automation is achieved, but the data generated is often incorrect, imprecise, or irrelevant

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation of service data generationVSAvoidprecision of generated service data
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback loops where service technicians verify and correct AI-generated service data, and this corrected data is fed back to retrain and improve the AI model. This continuous feedback mechanism resolves the contradiction by maintaining automation while progressively improving data precision through learned corrections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary verification layer between the AI model and the final service data output. This intermediary consists of validation rules, expert knowledge bases, and technician review processes that filter and refine AI-generated content, ensuring precision while preserving automation benefits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If manual input adjustments are made to correct AI-generated data, then data precision is improved, but time consumption and operational complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of service dataVSAvoidtime for manual data adjustment
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-training AI models on historical service data and pre-establishing validation rules before actual service operations. This preparation reduces the need for manual adjustments during time-critical service situations, improving precision without proportionally increasing time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The AI model progressively performs self-correction through automated retraining on verified data, reducing the need for manual interventions over time. The system serves itself by automatically learning from corrections, thereby improving precision while decreasing the time and effort required for manual adjustments as the system matures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Quantity of substance

If existing AI models process large datasets, then comprehensive analysis is achieved, but the models struggle with unstructured data and processing efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevolume of processed service dataVSAvoidprocessing efficiency of AI model
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the processing of large service datasets by organizing data into structured categories (equipment type, service category, fault codes, etc.) and processing different segments through specialized AI models or rules. This segmentation improves processing efficiency while maintaining comprehensive analysis capabilities across the entire dataset.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Reliability

If generative AI models are fine-tuned with service records, then service recommendation accuracy is improved, but system complexity and training requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of service recommendationsVSAvoidcomplexity of AI model system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamic complexity management where the AI model structure and training requirements adapt based on the volume and quality of available service records. As more data becomes available, the system dynamically adjusts its model complexity and fine-tuning depth, improving recommendation accuracy while managing system complexity through adaptive scaling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20240403613A1Building management system with equipment service recommendations and analytics using large language model fine-tuned with equipment service records
Publication Date: 2024.12.05 TYCO FIRE & SECURITY GMBH
  • US20240403613A1 patent drawing
  • US20240403613A1 patent drawing
  • US20240403613A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method includes generating a plurality of data pairs by prompting a generative AI model to output, for each of a plurality of service records, a data pair comprising a question and an answer. The question relates to an equipment issue indicated in the service record and the answer relates to a service task indicated in the service record. The method also includes fine-tuning the generative AI model using the plurality of data pairs and providing a service recommendation using the generative AI model.