Generative AI Content Lineage and Licensing Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current approaches for generative artificial intelligence (AI) lack effective methods to detect intellectual property (IP) infringement, license usage, and track the lineage of generated assets, leading to legal uncertainties and potential violations.

Innovation Solution

A platform is provided that enables licensing, lineage tracing, and verification of assets using machine learning models and metadata analysis to ensure compliance with IP laws, allowing rightsholders to manage their content and ensure proper attribution and compensation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If generative AI models are trained on unlicensed content, then model training data availability is improved, but intellectual property violation risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining data availabilityVSAvoidIP violation risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by requiring rightsholders to register their content and establish licensing terms before generative AI models can access and train on that content. This pre-establishment of licensing frameworks prevents IP violations during model training while still providing access to licensed content.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary licensing platform that mediates between rightsholders and generative AI model trainers. This intermediary system verifies licensing status, manages content access rights, and ensures proper attribution, thereby enabling model training on licensed content while protecting intellectual property rights.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If traditional content monitoring methods are used, then detection simplicity is maintained, but IP infringement detection accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection simplicityVSAvoidinfringement detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical content monitoring methods with AI-based detection systems that use machine learning models to analyze and detect IP infringements. These intelligent systems can identify subtle similarities and patterns that traditional methods miss, significantly improving detection accuracy while maintaining operational simplicity through automated processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where detection results are continuously refined based on rightsholder confirmations and model performance data. This feedback loop improves the precision of infringement detection over time while the system maintains ease of operation through automated learning and adaptation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Loss of time

If reactive infringement detection is used, then response time is reduced, but IP protection effectiveness deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse timeVSAvoidIP protection effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by establishing licensing agreements and content registration before infringements occur. Rightsholders can proactively register their content and define licensing terms in advance, enabling the system to detect and prevent infringements before they cause significant harm, thus improving both response time and protection effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements continuous feedback mechanisms that provide real-time notifications to rightsholders about potential infringements. This feedback system enables rapid response while maintaining effective IP protection through automated alerting and tracking of infringement patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250258892A1Generative artificial intelligence content management
Publication Date: 2025.08.14 DRSK AI CORP
  • US20250258892A1 patent drawing
  • US20250258892A1 patent drawing
  • US20250258892A1 patent drawing

AI summary

This disclosure relates to approaches for managing generative artificial intelligence content. Some aspects relate to managing and enforcing licensing conditions for various actors in generative artificial intelligence, such as content creators, model owners, and platform providers. Some aspects relate to lineage tracing, in which an asset is analyzed to determine what other assets it was based on and/or to determine which other assets were generated based on a given asset. Lineage tracing can be based on one or more of metadata analysis, hash analysis (such as perception hash analysis), or vector similarity. In some implementations, a vector embedding model is used to generate vector embeddings of assets, and the vector embeddings are compared to identify similar assets.