Generative AI Error Detection Using Counter-Processing Networks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional artificial intelligence generative engines are prone to computing hallucinations, making it difficult to identify and rectify errors before they cause cascading errors and malfunctions, particularly in downstream systems, and existing evaluation methods increase startup latency and impede processing.

Innovation Solution

A system with a network flow circuit arrangement using multiple AI engine networks for error detection and remediation, including a first AI engine for affirmative processing and a second AI engine for negative indicator processing, to identify and rectify defects in training data and processing, while maintaining real-time evaluation without latency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional AI generative engines process data without real-time error detection, then processing speed and productivity are maintained, but errors such as computing hallucinations occur and cause cascading failures in downstream systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror detection capabilityVSAvoidsystem architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the AI processing pipeline into distinct segments: a first AI engine for generating output data, a second AI engine for detecting negative indicators and errors, and a third AI engine for validating data before downstream processing. This segmentation allows each engine to specialize in specific functions, improving reliability without requiring a single monolithic complex system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces intermediary AI engines between the data generation and downstream processing stages. The second AI engine acts as an intermediary that detects errors in output data, and the third AI engine serves as another intermediary that validates data before it reaches downstream systems. These intermediaries prevent errors from propagating without requiring fundamental changes to the core processing architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If existing evaluation methods are used to assess AI outputs, then error detection is performed, but startup latency increases and processing is impeded

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror detection accuracyVSAvoidprocessing latency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary error detection using the second AI engine that specifically identifies negative indicators and errors in output data before the data reaches downstream processing stages. This preliminary action allows error detection to occur in advance, preventing errors from causing downstream failures without requiring additional time during the main processing operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent maintains continuous processing by implementing parallel AI engines that operate simultaneously. The first AI engine generates output data while the second AI engine concurrently detects errors in the same data stream. This continuity ensures that error detection does not interrupt or delay the main processing workflow, as both functions proceed in parallel rather than sequentially.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Manufacturing precision

If AI engines process large quantities of training data to improve accuracy, then model performance increases, but the complexity of detecting and remediating errors in training data increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoutput accuracyVSAvoiddata validation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and isolates the error detection function into a separate second AI engine that specifically analyzes output data for negative indicators. This extraction allows the main training process to focus on improving accuracy using large datasets while the error detection function independently handles the complexity of identifying and remediating errors in the training data and output.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS20260050523A1Electronic system for error detection and remediation in artificial intelligence generative engines
Publication Date: 2026.02.19 BANK OF AMERICA CORP
  • US20260050523A1 patent drawing
  • US20260050523A1 patent drawing
  • US20260050523A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to apparatuses, systems, methods and computer program products for error detection and remediation in artificial intelligence generative engines. The system typically is structured for network flow circuit arrangement with counter-processing engine components for localizing errors, detecting inaccurate basis in training data, and validating data generated in a distributed network. In some aspects, the system comprises a first artificial intelligence engine network structured for generating output data based on affirmative indicator processing, The system further comprises a second artificial intelligence engine network operatively connected to the first artificial intelligence engine network, wherein the second artificial intelligence engine network is structured to challenge the challenge the first artificial intelligence engine for error detection based on negative indicator processing. Upon identifying a defect, the system is structured to process remediation actions at the first artificial intelligence engine network.