Generative AI Attack Simulation for Federated Identity APIs

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Large organizations face challenges in efficiently, securely, and uniformly managing information exchange between internal and external computer systems, particularly through APIs, which are vulnerable to malicious attacks such as unauthorized access, API brute-force attacks, and API injection attacks, leading to security risks and outages.

Innovation Solution

An intelligent attack vector analysis and mitigation system using generative AI simulation environments to simulate attacker behavior, analyze potential attack vectors, and develop mitigation strategies for federated identity and hypermedia APIs, incorporating adversarial machine learning to detect anomalies and vulnerabilities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If blocking strategies are applied to defend against API attacks, then immediate protection is provided, but the ability to identify attackers and gather intelligence is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveAPI security protectionVSAvoidattacker intelligence
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an API security service as an intermediary component that sits between the API gateway and the blocking strategy. This service captures and analyzes API traffic, enabling intelligence gathering about attackers while still allowing the blocking strategy to provide immediate protection. The intermediary service processes requests, gathers intelligence, and makes informed decisions about blocking, thus resolving the contradiction between immediate protection and intelligence gathering.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Difficulty of detecting and measuring

If traditional security monitoring is used to detect API attacks, then basic attack detection is achieved, but novel attack vectors and hidden vulnerabilities remain undetected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattack detection capabilityVSAvoidnovel attack vector intelligence
Core Design Contradiction:
Difficulty of detecting and measuringVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary action by using generative AI to simulate attacker behaviors and generate synthetic attack data before actual attacks occur. The system pre-trains detection models on diverse attack scenarios, including novel attack vectors, so that when real attacks happen, the system can detect them more effectively. This preliminary preparation enables detection of both known and novel attack patterns without losing intelligence about emerging threats.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Stability of the object's composition

If static security rules are applied to API traffic, then consistent security enforcement is achieved, but adaptability to evolving threats is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity policy consistencyVSAvoidthreat response adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by implementing a feedback loop where the generative AI system continuously learns from actual attack patterns and adjusts security policies accordingly. The system maintains stable baseline security rules while dynamically adapting to new threats through machine learning. The adaptive component updates detection models and generates new security rules based on evolving attack patterns, thus maintaining both consistency and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Measurement precision

If comprehensive security analysis is performed on all API traffic, then thorough security inspection is achieved, but system performance and response time deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity analysis accuracyVSAvoidAPI request processing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements partial action by applying different levels of security analysis to different types of API traffic. Low-risk requests receive minimal inspection to maintain fast processing, while suspicious or high-risk requests undergo comprehensive analysis. The system uses initial filtering to identify requests that need detailed inspection, thus achieving thorough security analysis where needed without sacrificing overall system performance and response time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20250274480A1Intelligent Attack Vector Analysis and Mitigation System
Publication Date: 2025.08.28 BANK OF AMERICA CORP
  • US20250274480A1 patent drawing
  • US20250274480A1 patent drawing
  • US20250274480A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An intelligent attack vector analysis and mitigation system incorporates an intelligent process to analyze potential attack vectors from a suspicious attacker. The intelligent attack vector analysis and mitigation system leverages a generative artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled simulation environment to isolate and/or simulate attackers using federated identity and a hypermedia application programming interface (API). The system analyzes actual and/or potential attack vectors by leveraging the generative AI simulation and provides behavioral analysis with a specific focus on federated identity and/or hypermedia API components. As such, the system provides insights into novel attack vectors, vulnerabilities, and effective mitigation strategies that may then be automatically incorporated and/or implemented on the enterprise network by the intelligent attack vector analysis and mitigation system. The process utilizes continuous improvement, adaptation to evolving threats, and a holistic understanding of the system's security posture to improve and enable the enterprise organization's network security system.