Generative AI Personalized Cognitive Behavioral Exercises

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) smartphone apps lack personalization, relying on generic exercises and AI-driven recommendations that fail to resonate with individual life situations and emotional states, leading to an impersonal therapeutic experience.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that utilize generative artificial intelligence and natural language processing to create personalized cognitive behavioral exercises tailored to a user's unique life situations, mental state, and preferences, delivered through a multimodal interface including text, audio, video, and virtual reality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If generic cognitive behavioral exercises are used, then the system can provide evidence-based therapeutic content, but the therapeutic experience feels impersonal and disconnected from the user's unique life situations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevidence-based therapeutic contentVSAvoidpersonalization to user's life situations
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs a pre-assessment before delivering exercises to gather information about the user's life situations, triggers, and preferences. This preliminary action enables the system to personalize subsequent exercise content while maintaining evidence-based foundations, resolving the contradiction between using generic proven content and adapting it to individual needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system takes generic evidence-based cognitive behavioral exercises and modifies specific local elements (such as inserting the user's actual triggers, situations, and preferences into the exercise content) while preserving the overall therapeutic structure. This allows the exercises to remain evidence-based while feeling personally relevant to the user's unique circumstances.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Extent of automation

If AI-driven recommendations are used to curate exercises, then the system can filter content based on user preferences, but the recommendations still lack deep personalization and feel analogous to Netflix or Spotify rather than truly therapeutic

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveAI-driven content curationVSAvoiddeep personalization to emotional states
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where user responses to exercises, emotional states, and pre-assessment data are fed back into the AI personalization engine. This feedback mechanism allows the system to dynamically adjust and deepen personalization over time, moving beyond static content filtering to adaptive therapeutic content generation that responds to the user's evolving emotional state.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The AI system acts as an intermediary that translates between the user's personal life situation data and the evidence-based exercise library. Rather than simply filtering pre-made content like Netflix, the AI generates personalized exercise variations by mediating between the user's unique circumstances and therapeutic principles, creating content that is both evidence-based and deeply personal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Ease of operation

If personalized cognitive behavioral exercises are created, then user engagement and retention improve, but creating truly personalized content at scale becomes challenging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser engagement and retentionVSAvoidsystem complexity for creating personalized content
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables users to contribute to their own personalization through pre-assessments, feedback on their emotional states, and responses to exercises. This self-service approach allows the system to generate personalized content at scale without requiring complex manual customization for each user, as the users themselves provide the personalization data through their interactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The AI personalization engine uses parameter changes to efficiently generate personalized exercises by adjusting specific variables (such as inserting user-specific triggers, modifying exercise scenarios, and adjusting difficulty levels) rather than creating entirely new content for each user. This parameter-based approach maintains high personalization quality while managing system complexity and enabling scale.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250025084A1System and method of delivering interactive, personalized cognitive behavioral interventions
Publication Date: 2025.01.23 SNITKOVSKY VADIM
  • US20250025084A1 patent drawing
  • US20250025084A1 patent drawing
  • US20250025084A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for automatically producing a personalized cognitive exercise (PCE) includes a user interface; at least one processor; an interactive display; and at least one data storage unit. The user interface can collect data regarding a user's mental state. The processor can execute computer instructions that: perform a pre-assessment, extract, prepare, and format the data to produce formatted data, generate with generative artificial intelligence the PCE from the formatted data and a set of generic cognitive exercises; perform a post-assessment, and assess an impact of the PCE by comparing the post-assessment to the pre-assessment. The interactive display can interactively present the PCE, producing at least one medium selected from the group consisting of text, audio, video, image, and virtual reality (VR). The data storage unit can retrievably store the data and the generic cognitive exercises