Generative AI Provenance Engine for Auditable Specific Citations

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current generative AI tools generate incorrect responses, rely on unverified data sources, lack specific citations, and fail to integrate user-supplied content, making them unreliable for rigorous fields requiring high accuracy and authenticity.

Innovation Solution

A system that includes a provenance engine to preprocess input prompts, ensuring specific citations to reliable user-supplied or identified content sources, validating and scoring these citations to enhance response accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If GAI tools use publicly available Internet data sources, then the tools are useful as a web search, but the data sources do not meet the rigorous requirements and vetting of knowledge workers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveusefulness as web searchVSAvoiddata source vetting
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary layer (the system with provenance engine and citation module) between the GAI tool and data sources. This intermediary verifies, validates, and tracks the origin of each data point, transforming unvetted public data into verified information with identifiable sources that meet professional standards while maintaining web search functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where generated content is traced back to source materials through citations and provenance tracking. This creates a verification loop where knowledge workers can validate data sources, and the system can identify and correct problematic sources, continuously improving data reliability while maintaining versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If GAI tools generate content quickly, then productivity is improved, but the content requires line by line verification which destroys productivity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent generation speedVSAvoidmanual verification time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary verification actions during the content generation process itself. By integrating provenance tracking, source validation, and citation generation into the generation workflow, the system prepares verified content upfront, eliminating the need for subsequent line-by-line verification and maintaining productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The verification feedback is provided immediately during content generation rather than requiring separate manual review. The system continuously monitors and validates sources, providing real-time feedback on content reliability, which allows knowledge workers to trust the output without extensive post-generation verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If GAI tools do not identify specific locations in content sources, then the tools operate on general webpages, but the citation information is nearly useless and requires manual searching

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation on general webpagesVSAvoidspecific citation information
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments content sources into specific identifiable locations (pages, sections, passages, sentences) and associates each generated content element with its precise source location. This segmentation transforms general webpage references into specific, actionable citations that directly point to the supporting information without requiring manual searching.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Reliability

If GAI tools allow users to specify content sources, then compliance with high scrutiny for content authenticity is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent authenticity complianceVSAvoidsystem configuration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a universal interface that handles multiple content source types (files, websites, databases) through a single standardized mechanism. The provenance engine and citation module work uniformly across different source types, allowing users to specify diverse content sources without increasing operational complexity, while maintaining high compliance with authenticity requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20250225316A1Generative AI With Specific, Auditable Citation References
Publication Date: 2025.07.10 2ND CHAIR LLC
  • US20250225316A1 patent drawing
  • US20250225316A1 patent drawing
  • US20250225316A1 patent drawing

AI summary

According to aspects of the disclosed subject matter, systems and methods for providing a generated response to an input prompt are presented, where the generated response includes auditable, specific citations to one or more content sources. Moreover, and in various embodiments, the generated responses may utilize, in whole or in part, user-supplied content and/or user-identified content as content sources for responding to an input prompt.