Generative AI Content Search with Hybrid Result Aggregation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing content searching systems using generative AI models are slow and expensive in live production environments, and traditional methods rely on keyword matching rather than understanding the meaning of queries, lacking transparency and efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing both generative AI and traditional search sub-systems to generate and aggregate search results, leveraging the 'hallucination' feature of generative AI to create confabulated items that match query meaning, and employing a vector database for similarity retrieval, with transparency features for debugging and compliance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If generative AI models are used for content searching, then the system can understand the meaning of queries and generate relevant results, but the processing speed becomes slow and the cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequery understanding accuracyVSAvoidprocessing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The search system is divided into two independent subsystems: a traditional search subsystem that handles fast keyword-based retrieval, and a generative AI subsystem that handles semantic understanding and confabulated result generation. Each subsystem operates independently and processes different aspects of the search query, allowing the system to maintain both speed and accuracy without requiring one subsystem to compensate for the other's weaknesses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines the results from both the traditional search subsystem and the generative AI subsystem into a unified search result presentation. The aggregation layer merges fast keyword matches with semantically relevant confabulated results, providing a comprehensive answer that leverages the strengths of both approaches while mitigating their individual weaknesses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Adaptability or versatility

If generative AI models are used for content searching, then the system can generate confabulated search results, but the expense increases in live production environments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesearch result generation capabilityVSAvoidcomputational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies generative AI processing selectively rather than to all search queries. The traditional search subsystem handles routine keyword-based searches efficiently, while the generative AI subsystem is invoked for queries requiring deeper semantic understanding or when traditional search yields insufficient results. This partial application of the expensive generative process reduces overall computational costs while maintaining versatility where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Productivity

If traditional keyword matching is used for search, then the processing is fast and cheap, but the system cannot understand the meaning of queries

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidquery understanding accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary layer that translates between keyword-based search results and semantically meaningful confabulated results. The generative AI model acts as a mediator that takes simple keyword queries and transforms them into comprehensive, contextually relevant search results by generating confabulated content that captures the intended meaning behind the keywords.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Measurement precision

If human-reviewed items are used to map representative items to queries, then the search results are accurate, but the process is slow and expensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesearch result relevanceVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables the generative AI model to self-generate confabulated search results without requiring manual human review for each query. The model learns from training data to autonomously produce accurate and relevant search results, eliminating the time-consuming and expensive human-in-the-loop process while maintaining high relevance through the model's semantic understanding capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20250298836A1Using generative ai models for content searching and generation of confabulated search results
Publication Date: 2025.09.25 DROPBOX INC
  • US20250298836A1 patent drawing
  • US20250298836A1 patent drawing
  • US20250298836A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems provide content searching and retrieval using generative artificial intelligence (AI) Models. The system is configured to receive a user search for content, media or item listings. The user search is provided to a generative AI based search sub-system and to a traditional search sub-system. A first search result listing is generated by the generative AI based subsystem, and a second search result listing is generated by the traditional search sub-system. The first search result listing and the second search result listing are aggregated together and provided for display to a user client device.