Generative Model Allocation Using Task Evaluation Results

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems struggle to effectively allocate generative models to tasks based on their evaluation results, leading to inefficiencies in task execution.

Innovation Solution

An information processing apparatus and method that includes an evaluation result acquisition unit to evaluate multiple generative models and an allocation unit to determine the optimal models for a given task based on these results, ensuring appropriate allocation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple generative models are evaluated and allocated based on evaluation results, then task execution performance and accuracy are improved, but system complexity and computational overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask execution performanceVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes parameters by introducing evaluation results as a new dimension for model selection. Instead of arbitrarily selecting generative models, the system evaluates each model's performance on specific tasks and uses these evaluation metrics (parameters) to determine optimal model allocation, thereby improving task execution performance while managing complexity through systematic parameter-based decision making

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements self-service by automatically evaluating generative models and allocating them to tasks based on their performance characteristics. The allocation unit autonomously determines which models to deploy without manual intervention, using the evaluation results to self-optimize the system configuration for each task, thus improving performance while reducing operational complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Measurement precision

If generative models are allocated based on evaluation results, then task execution accuracy is improved, but evaluation and allocation time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask execution accuracyVSAvoidevaluation and allocation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies preliminary action by pre-evaluating generative models before actual task execution. The evaluation unit assesses model performance in advance, creating a repository of evaluation results that can be quickly referenced during allocation. This preliminary evaluation establishes performance baselines that speed up subsequent allocation decisions while maintaining high task execution accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements dynamics by making the model allocation process adaptive and task-specific. Rather than using static model assignments, the allocation unit dynamically selects models based on real-time evaluation results that reflect each model's strengths for different task types. This dynamic approach optimizes accuracy for each specific task while managing time through intelligent, context-aware selection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20260023602A1Information processing apparatus, allocation method, and recording medium
Publication Date: 2026.01.22 NEC CORP
  • US20260023602A1 patent drawing
  • US20260023602A1 patent drawing
  • US20260023602A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An information processing apparatus includes an evaluation result acquisition unit for acquiring an evaluation result obtained by evaluating a plurality of generative models subjected to machine learning in such a way as to execute a given task and generate a deliverable; and an allocation unit for decision making to determine a plurality of generative models to be allocated to a target task to be executed based on the evaluation result regarding the target task.