Generative Pre-Training for Vision Backbone Feature Distillation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional supervised and unsupervised pre-training methods for image-based and video-based AI rely on object-centric datasets that lack diversity and flexibility, leading to poor training efficiency and increased costs, especially when curated by third-party providers unaware of the AI model's objectives.

Innovation Solution

Employ unsupervised or semi-supervised pre-training using generative models and large-scale unlabeled data to improve accuracy in downstream tasks, leveraging feature distillation and label distillation to align and update the vision backbone without labeled datasets.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If object-centric datasets are used for pre-training, then the pre-training process can be completed with structured data, but the diversity and flexibility of the training data is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepre-training process completenessVSAvoidtraining data diversity and flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

A domain adaptation layer is introduced as an intermediary component between the pre-trained backbone and the downstream task. This layer enables the model to adapt to different domains and tasks without requiring retraining of the entire backbone, thereby increasing data flexibility and diversity while maintaining the structured pre-training approach

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The model is segmented into two independent parts: a frozen pre-trained backbone and a trainable domain adaptation layer. This segmentation allows the backbone to be trained on structured object-centric data while the adaptation layer learns from diverse, domain-specific data, resolving the contradiction between structured training completeness and data diversity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of operation

If third-party curated datasets are used, then data assembly is simplified, but the relevance to specific AI model objectives is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata assembly simplicityVSAvoiddata relevance to model objectives
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The domain adaptation layer serves as a mediator that bridges generic third-party curated data and task-specific requirements. It allows the model to use easily assembled third-party datasets while adapting them to be relevant for specific AI model objectives through task-specific training of the adaptation layer

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The backbone is pre-trained in advance on general object-centric data from third-party sources. This preliminary action simplifies data assembly while the subsequent domain adaptation phase ensures relevance to specific model objectives by fine-tuning the adaptation layer on task-specific data

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Loss of information

If conventional supervised pre-training is used, then labeled datasets can be utilized, but training costs and time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelabeled data utilizationVSAvoidpre-training time and cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The backbone is pre-trained once on large-scale labeled object-centric datasets. This preliminary supervised pre-training captures general visual features efficiently. Subsequently, the domain adaptation layer is trained on smaller task-specific datasets, reducing the overall training time and cost while still utilizing labeled data effectively

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of training the entire model with labeled data, only the domain adaptation layer is trained with task-specific labeled data while the backbone features are copied from the pre-trained model. This reduces training costs and time while preserving the benefits of labeled data utilization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

4Measurement precision

If the entire model is retrained for downstream tasks, then task-specific accuracy can be optimized, but training efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask-specific accuracyVSAvoidtraining efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The model is segmented into a frozen backbone and a trainable domain adaptation layer. Only the adaptation layer is retrained for downstream tasks, maintaining task-specific accuracy optimization while significantly improving training efficiency by avoiding retraining of the entire model

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The task-specific adaptation capability is extracted from the entire model and isolated into a separate domain adaptation layer. This allows the backbone to remain frozen while the adaptation layer is optimized for specific tasks, achieving task accuracy without the computational cost of full model retraining

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS12488221B2Unsupervised pre-training of neural networks using generative models
Publication Date: 2025.12.02 NVIDIA CORP
  • US12488221B2 patent drawing
  • US12488221B2 patent drawing
  • US12488221B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In various examples, systems and methods are disclosed relating to generating a response from image and/or video input for image/video-based artificial intelligence (AI) systems and applications. Systems and methods are disclosed for a first model (e.g., a teacher model) distilling its knowledge to a second model (a student model). The second model receives a downstream image in a downstream task and generates at least one feature. The first model generates first features corresponding to an image which can be a real image or a synthetic image. The second model generates second features using the image as an input to the second model. Loss with respect to first features is determined. The second model is updated using the loss.