Engine-Driven Generator Controller Weld Load Adaptation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Typical engine-driven generators used for welding and similar operations lack customizable control over engine settings, leading to inefficient energy consumption and noise issues due to generic speed control mechanisms that do not distinguish between welding and auxiliary loads, and require manual shutdown and restart.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that includes a controller to detect welding demands and adjust internal combustion engine speed based on preset parameters, transitioning between control regimes to optimize engine operation for different loads and reduce idle energy consumption.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the engine operates at a generic idle speed to simplify control, then the ease of operation is improved, but the energy consumption increases and noise levels rise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The engine control system transitions from a static generic idle speed to a dynamic controlled speed regime. The controller continuously monitors load conditions (welding vs. auxiliary) and adjusts the engine speed accordingly, enabling the system to adapt its operating parameters in real-time based on actual demand rather than maintaining a fixed idle speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the engine speed parameter based on detected load conditions. When welding load is detected, the controller increases engine speed from idle to operational levels. When only auxiliary loads are present, the engine maintains a reduced speed. This parameter adjustment resolves the contradiction by optimizing energy consumption while maintaining operational capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If the engine speed is increased quickly to meet welding load demand, then the productivity is improved, but the stability of the engine speed control deteriorates due to potential overshooting

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveproductivityVSAvoidengine speed stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The controller is pre-programmed with custom control regimes specific to welding loads, allowing it to anticipate and prepare for speed adjustments. When welding demand is detected, the controller immediately applies the optimized control algorithm that balances rapid response with stability, preventing overshooting while maintaining productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements closed-loop feedback control where the controller continuously monitors engine speed and load conditions. This feedback mechanism allows the controller to adjust the speed increase rate in real-time, slowing down the adjustment if approaching the target speed too quickly, thereby maintaining stability while still achieving rapid response to welding demands.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Use of energy by moving object

If the engine operates at reduced idle speed during non-use periods to save energy, then the energy consumption is reduced, but the ease of operation worsens due to manual restart requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy consumptionVSAvoidease of operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides self-service through automatic engine restart capability. When the controller detects that a welding load has been connected, it automatically restarts the engine without requiring manual intervention. This eliminates the operational inconvenience of manual restart while maintaining energy savings during non-use periods, as the engine only runs when actually needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Device complexity

If a generic governor curve is used to control engine speed for all loads, then the device complexity is reduced, but the adaptability to different load conditions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice complexityVSAvoidadaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The control system segments the load types into distinct categories (welding load vs. auxiliary load) and applies different control regimes to each segment. Rather than using a single generic governor curve, the controller identifies the load type and selects the appropriate control algorithm, enabling optimized performance for each specific application while maintaining manageable system complexity through clear segmentation logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS8115328B2Weld setting based engine-driven generator control system and method
Publication Date: 2012.02.14 ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS INC
  • US8115328B2 patent drawing
  • US8115328B2 patent drawing
  • US8115328B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method are provided for controlling an internal combustion engine driving a generator/welder or a stand-alone generator. The engine and/or the generator is controlled based upon settings for welding. Controlling the engine may include altering the engine speed based upon a detected demand on the generator and/or operating parameters of a welder.