Genetic Algorithm Calibration for Neural Network Quantization Scale Factors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The calibration of scale factors for quantization in neural networks is challenging due to the mismatch in precision between calibration hardware and deployment hardware, leading to inaccurate results and increased processing time.

Innovation Solution

A genetic algorithm is employed to calibrate scale factors by generating an initial population of chromosomes, each representing a set of scale factors for layers of a machine learning model. The algorithm evaluates each chromosome by quantizing weights and datasets, processing them through an accelerator circuit, and gauging accuracy. The population is evolved until termination criteria are met, selecting the chromosome with the highest accuracy for configuring the accelerator.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If floating point values are quantized to integer values using a scale factor, then hardware requirements are reduced and runtime performance is improved, but accuracy of the results is significantly affected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveruntime performanceVSAvoidaccuracy of results
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameters being optimized from individual weight quantization to scale factor quantization. By treating scale factors as chromosomal genes and using genetic algorithms to evolve optimal scale factor combinations, the system maintains accuracy while achieving hardware efficiency. The scale factors are adjusted iteratively through selection, crossover, and mutation operations to find the optimal configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback by evaluating the accuracy of quantized results using a representative dataset and using this feedback to guide the genetic algorithm's evolution. The accuracy metric serves as the fitness function that determines which chromosomes (scale factor configurations) are selected for the next generation, creating a closed-loop optimization process that continuously improves accuracy while maintaining hardware benefits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If scale factors are calibrated using genetic algorithms with population evolution, then accuracy is improved, but processing time is increased

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveaccuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-calculating and storing the optimal scale factors in a lookup table during an offline calibration phase. This pre-computed information is then reused during runtime without requiring repeated genetic algorithm executions, thus achieving high accuracy without incurring the computational time cost during actual inference operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the calibration process into distinct phases: offline calibration using genetic algorithms to build a lookup table, and online inference using pre-computed scale factors. This segmentation allows the computationally intensive accuracy-optimizing process to occur separately from time-critical inference operations, resolving the time-accuracy tradeoff.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Measurement precision

If the population of chromosomes is evolved through multiple generations, then the level of accuracy is improved, but the number of processing iterations increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelevel of accuracyVSAvoidprocessing throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by performing a limited number of genetic algorithm generations during offline calibration rather than exhaustive evolution. The calibration process stops when a satisfactory accuracy threshold is reached or a maximum generation limit is hit, accepting a partial optimization that balances accuracy improvement with computational resource consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12314863B1Determining quantization scale factors for layers of a machine learning model
Publication Date: 2025.05.27 XILINX INC
  • US12314863B1 patent drawing
  • US12314863B1 patent drawing
  • US12314863B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Approaches for determining quantization scale factors include generating a population of chromosomes. Each chromosome has multiple genes, and each gene specifies a scale factor associated with a layer of a machine learning model. The population of chromosomes are evaluated, and the evaluating includes, for each chromosome in the population, quantizing floating point weights and floating point values of a representative dataset using the scale factors of the chromosome to produce quantized weights and a quantized dataset in the memory arrangement, initiating processing of the quantized dataset using the quantized weights according to the machine learning model, and gauging a level of accuracy of results produced by the processing of the quantized dataset. Satisfaction of termination criteria is determined based the levels of accuracy associated with the chromosomes in the population. The population of chromosomes is evolved and the evaluating repeated in response to the termination criteria not being satisfied.