Genetic Algorithm for Cochlear Implant Parameter Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for fitting cochlear implant systems to individual patients are time-consuming, costly, and unreliable due to the non-linear and non-monotonic interactions of parameters, making it impractical to optimize settings using traditional sequential adjustment techniques.

Innovation Solution

A genetic algorithm system that uses bit strings to represent parameter values and employs techniques like overloaded generations, amplification, tagging, tabu search, and variable selection to quickly converge on an optimal parameter map, accounting for patient feedback and variability in preferences over time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional sequential parameter adjustment methods are used to fit cochlear implant systems, then the fitting process can be performed with simple equipment, but the process becomes time-consuming and fails to achieve optimal outcomes due to non-linear parameter interactions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter optimization accuracyVSAvoidfitting process duration
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical sequential adjustment process with a computational genetic algorithm system. The system uses computer-based automated evaluation and optimization, substituting manual clinician adjustment with algorithmic parameter optimization that can handle non-linear interactions efficiently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements parallel evaluation of multiple parameter combinations simultaneously rather than sequential adjustment. The genetic algorithm generates and evaluates numerous parameter maps in parallel, allowing the system to navigate the complex parameter space and identify optimal configurations without being constrained by sequential processing limitations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If all possible parameter map alternatives are evaluated for each patient, then the optimal parameter map can be identified, but the process becomes impractical due to the vast number of alternatives

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter map optimizationVSAvoidfitting efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the vast parameter map search space into manageable generations of candidate solutions. The genetic algorithm divides the optimization process into discrete generations, where each generation evaluates a specific subset of parameter maps. This segmentation allows the system to progressively refine solutions without being overwhelmed by the total number of possible alternatives.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent evaluates a sufficient number of parameter map alternatives through the genetic algorithm process rather than attempting to evaluate all possible combinations. The algorithm generates enough candidate solutions to guarantee finding the optimal or near-optimal parameter map while stopping before becoming computationally impractical, achieving the right balance between thoroughness and efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Productivity

If default parameter values are used for all patients, then the fitting process becomes quick and simple, but the outcome fails to account for individual patient needs and heterogeneity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefitting speedVSAvoidpatient-specific customization
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables the system to automatically determine optimal parameter maps for each patient without requiring extensive manual customization by the clinician. The genetic algorithm autonomously evaluates patient-specific responses and self-adjusts parameters to find the optimal configuration, making the system self-sufficient in the customization process while maintaining individualized treatment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates real-time patient feedback into the optimization process. The system evaluates patient responses to different parameter maps and uses this feedback to guide the genetic algorithm toward optimal configurations. This feedback mechanism ensures that the final parameter settings are specifically tailored to each patient's needs while maintaining efficient automated operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP2475343B1Using a genetic algorithm to fit a medical implant system to a patient
Publication Date: 2016.07.13 COCHLEAR LIMITED
  • EP2475343B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2475343B1 patent drawingFigure 2A~2B
  • EP2475343B1 patent drawingFigure 3A~3E

AI summary

Apparatus and method for at least partially fitting a medical implant system to a patient is described. These apparatuses and methods comprise executing a genetic algorithm to select a set of parameter values for the medical implant system. This genetic algorithm may comprise executing a tabu search wherein value sets that are determined to be bad are added to a tabu list that may be consulted to exclude tabu value sets from successive generations of the genetic algorithm.