Genetic Algorithm Cohort Selection for Agile Clinical Trials

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for assigning entities to cohorts in agile processes, such as clinical studies, rely on static criteria, leading to suboptimal cohort assignments and inefficient treatment/medicine efficacy determination.

Innovation Solution

A method and system utilizing genetic algorithms to dynamically create and evaluate cohorts by encoding environmental, epigenetic, physiological, and cognitive traits into a DNA strand, allowing for iterative cohort selection and optimization, including crossover and mutation techniques to improve cohort matching and treatment efficacy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If static criteria are used to assign entities to cohorts, then the assignment process is simple and quick, but the cohort assignments are suboptimal and treatment efficacy determination is inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecohort assignment qualityVSAvoidselection process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamic optimization by using genetic algorithms that iteratively evolve cohort assignments. Instead of static criteria, the system dynamically adjusts entity assignments to cohorts through multiple generations of selection, crossover, and mutation operations, improving assignment quality while managing complexity through automated evolutionary processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters by encoding entity attributes and cohort characteristics into configurable weightings and fitness functions. The genetic algorithm modifies these parameters across generations, adjusting the importance of different attributes and optimizing the overall cohort assignment quality based on treatment efficacy goals

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If genetic algorithms are used to dynamically create cohorts, then optimal groupings and treatment efficacy are improved, but the computational complexity and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment efficacy determinationVSAvoidcohort selection time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-defining the fitness function, attribute weightings, and selection criteria before the genetic algorithm execution. This preparation phase allows the algorithm to focus computational resources on optimization rather than parameter definition, reducing overall processing time while maintaining efficacy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by implementing early stopping criteria and iterative refinement where the genetic algorithm runs for a predetermined number of generations or until convergence is achieved. This prevents excessive computation while still obtaining near-optimal cohort assignments that satisfy treatment efficacy requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Loss of information

If static criteria are used for cohort assignment, then the process is easy to implement, but non-obvious relationships and optimal groupings cannot be identified

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverelationship identification capabilityVSAvoidalgorithm complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where the fitness function evaluates cohort assignments based on treatment efficacy and feeds this information back into the genetic algorithm. This feedback loop allows the algorithm to learn from previous generations, identify non-obvious relationships between entity attributes, and progressively improve cohort groupings while managing complexity through structured evaluation criteria

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11955209B2Cohort selection for agile processes
Publication Date: 2024.04.09 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US11955209B2 patent drawing
  • US11955209B2 patent drawing
  • US11955209B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems for cohort selection for agile processes are disclosed. A method includes: assigning, by a computing device, each of a plurality of entities to one of a plurality of groups; and for each of the plurality of groups: for each of the entities in the group, determining, by the computing device, information about the entity and encoding the determined information about the entity using a genetic algorithm; determining a ranking, by the computing device, of each of the entities in the group based on the encoded information about each of entity in the group; crossing over, by the computing device, portions of the encoded information of pairs of entities occupying adjacent positions in the ranking; and measuring, by the computing device, fitness of each of the entities in the group.