Genetic Algorithm Feature Selection for EEG Dementia Diagnosis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for detecting beta amyloid in dementia patients, such as amyloid PET tests, are expensive and not guaranteed to provide a positive result for medication prescription, while electroencephalogram (EEG) is a low-cost but less effective method for diagnosing dementia due to the need to identify optimal EEG channels and frequencies for disease prediction.

Innovation Solution

A machine learning method using a genetic algorithm for feature selection that constructs a high-accuracy learning model by defining feature sets including EEG occurrence locations and frequency bands, generating feature combinations, calculating prediction accuracy, and updating the feature set to determine good features for disease classification.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If EEG is used for disease diagnosis, then cost is reduced, but diagnostic accuracy deteriorates due to difficulty in identifying optimal channels and frequencies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic accuracyVSAvoidfeature selection complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-defining a structured feature set that includes specific EEG channels (e.g., Fp1, Fp2, F3, F4, C3, C4, P3, P4, O1, O2) and frequency bands (delta, theta, alpha, beta, gamma) before the actual diagnosis process. This preliminary organization of features into a systematic framework enables the genetic algorithm to efficiently evaluate and select the most discriminative features, thereby improving diagnostic accuracy while managing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the manual or heuristic feature selection process with a genetic algorithm, which is an automated computational method inspired by natural selection. This substitution allows the system to automatically identify optimal EEG channels and frequency bands without manual intervention, significantly improving diagnostic accuracy while the automation manages the complexity of feature selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If all EEG channels and frequencies are analyzed, then diagnostic accuracy improves, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeature selection precisionVSAvoidsearch space complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the most relevant and discriminative features from the complete set of EEG channels and frequency bands using a genetic algorithm. Instead of analyzing all possible features, the algorithm evaluates each feature's contribution to disease classification and selects only those that provide the most information, thereby achieving high measurement precision while reducing the effective search space and computational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by selecting a subset of the most important EEG features rather than analyzing all channels and frequencies. The genetic algorithm determines the optimal number and combination of features needed for accurate diagnosis, performing only the necessary computations to achieve the required diagnostic precision without the excessive computational burden of analyzing every possible feature.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If feature dimension increases, then model accuracy improves, but training time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification accuracyVSAvoidtraining time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary feature selection using a genetic algorithm before the actual classification training. By pre-identifying and selecting the most discriminative features in advance, the system reduces the dimensionality of the data that needs to be processed during model training. This preliminary action maintains high classification accuracy while significantly reducing the training time required for the machine learning model.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses partial action by selecting only the essential features needed for accurate disease classification rather than using all available features. The genetic algorithm determines the optimal feature subset that provides sufficient information for high accuracy, avoiding the excessive training time that would result from processing all possible features while maintaining reliable classification performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11875878B2Machine learning method and apparatus using steps feature selection based on genetic algorithm
Publication Date: 2024.01.16 IMEDISYNC INC
  • US11875878B2 patent drawing
  • US11875878B2 patent drawing
  • US11875878B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to a machine learning method and apparatus using steps feature selection based on a genetic algorithm, and the machine learning method includes defining a feature set including a plurality of features, generating a plurality of feature combinations including n-dimensional features (n is a natural number) for the feature set, independently constructing feature models for the plurality of feature combinations and calculating prediction accuracy for each of the feature models as a prediction result for a predetermined data set, arranging the feature models according to the prediction accuracy to determine at least one good feature model that satisfies a preset criterion, determining at least one good feature from among features included in a corresponding feature set of the at least one good feature model, and updating the feature set to include only the at least one good feature and re-determining a good feature model for a (n+1)-dimensional feature combination based on the updated feature set.