Genetic Algorithm Signal Tracking for Multipath Error Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current GPS systems face challenges in tracking signals indoors and reducing multipath errors, particularly due to signal attenuation through structures and foliage, leading to poor accuracy and instability in phase lock loops, which existing solutions have not adequately addressed for practical, cost-effective implementation.

Innovation Solution

The use of concatenated Genetic and Local Optimization algorithms for acquiring and tracking time varying signals, specifically employing an enhanced genetic algorithm to generate multi-dimensional reference vectors for signal correlation processing, eliminating the need for traditional tracking loop implementations and incorporating cycle slip correction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional phase lock loops and delay lock loops are used for signal tracking, then the system can maintain basic tracking functionality, but the tracking becomes unstable and inaccurate in attenuated environments with multipath errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetracking stabilityVSAvoidsignal tracking accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the fundamental parameters of the tracking system by replacing traditional lock loop mechanisms with a genetic algorithm-based approach. The system uses population-based optimization with fitness evaluation to track signal parameters, fundamentally altering how tracking is achieved from deterministic loop-based methods to stochastic optimization methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent substitutes the mechanical/electrical feedback mechanism of traditional lock loops with a computational optimization system. Instead of using phase detectors and loop filters, the system employs genetic algorithms that evaluate multiple candidate solutions simultaneously, replacing the sequential feedback mechanism with parallel evolutionary optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If enhanced phase lock loops and fusion solutions are implemented to address tracking challenges, then signal tracking capability improves, but system complexity and integration challenges increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal tracking accuracyVSAvoidsystem integration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges acquisition and tracking functions into a single unified genetic algorithm framework. Instead of separating these functions into different subsystems as traditional methods do, the system uses one continuous optimization process that handles both initial signal acquisition and ongoing tracking, reducing the number of components and interfaces needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The genetic algorithm system performs multiple functions simultaneously: it acquires signals, tracks signal parameters, handles multipath errors, and adapts to changing environments all through a single algorithmic framework. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate specialized subsystems for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Measurement precision

If long coherent duration integration is used with high quality inertials and clocks to improve tracking, then measurement accuracy increases, but cost and implementation complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetracking accuracyVSAvoidimplementation cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces expensive, high-precision hardware components (quality inertials and clocks) with a computational approach that achieves similar accuracy through software-based optimization. The genetic algorithm compensates for hardware limitations, allowing the use of lower-cost components while maintaining tracking accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

4Duration of action of moving object

If code loop tracking is used in low SNR conditions to extend tracking capability, then tracking range increases, but large tracking errors occur resulting in poor accuracy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetracking durationVSAvoidtracking accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of moving objectVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic adaptation of tracking parameters through the genetic algorithm. The system continuously evolves its search strategy and parameter estimation based on current signal conditions, allowing it to maintain accuracy while extending tracking duration in low SNR environments where traditional fixed-parameter approaches fail.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS10671923B2Genetic method for the tracking of time varying signals
Publication Date: 2020.06.02 GEMTREX
  • US10671923B2 patent drawing
  • US10671923B2 patent drawing
  • US10671923B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for the coherent tracking of a time varying signal using evolutionary computing including global and local optimization techniques for the purpose of obtaining better performance under poor signal reception conditions, multipath errors, indoors, and for obtaining more accurate estimates of carrier phase, carrier frequency, and modulation phase at low signal levels without being subject to the traditional phase lock tracking loops (PLL) or delay lock tracking loops (DLL) limitations.