Genetic Model Validation Using Bone Marrow Transplant Data

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Non-human animal models for autoimmune diseases do not translate well to humans, necessitating better methods to validate genetic prediction models.

Innovation Solution

Develop methods using retrospective genotype and autoimmune phenotype data from bone marrow recipients and donors to validate genetic models by applying these models to datasets before and after bone marrow transplants, and assessing changes in autoimmune phenotypes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If non-human animal models are used to validate genetic prediction models, then the validation process can be performed, but the results do not translate well to humans

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalidity of genetic model predictionsVSAvoidapplicability to human subjects
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses human bone marrow transplant data as a copy of the actual clinical scenario, replacing animal model simulations with real human observational data. This allows validation of genetic models directly in the target population (humans) rather than relying on animal proxies, thereby improving both reliability and adaptability of the validation results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Adaptability or versatility

If human data is used to validate genetic models, then the applicability to human subjects improves, but the complexity of data collection and analysis increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplicability to human subjectsVSAvoidcomplexity of validation methodology
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts specific, high-value data elements (genotype and autoimmune phenotype data) from the complex bone marrow transplant dataset, focusing only on the variables necessary for validating genetic models. This extraction approach reduces analytical complexity by isolating relevant signals from the broader complexity of human clinical data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses bone marrow transplant data that serves multiple functions: it provides pre-transplant genetic baseline, post-transplant phenotype outcomes, and donor-recipient pairs for comparative analysis. This multi-functional dataset reduces the need for separate specialized studies, thereby managing complexity while improving applicability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Measurement precision

If retrospective data from bone marrow recipients and donors is used, then the validation accuracy improves, but the time required for data collection increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalidation accuracyVSAvoidtime for data collection
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent utilizes retrospective data where genotype and phenotype information were collected before the formal validation study began (during routine clinical care and transplant procedures). This preliminary collection of data eliminates the need for prospective data gathering, thereby improving validation accuracy without adding significant time to the validation process itself.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12537073B2Genetic model validation methods
Publication Date: 2026.01.27 THEMBA INC
  • US12537073B2 patent drawing
  • US12537073B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed are methods for evaluating genetic models that are predictive of autoimmune disease phenotype or status. The methods comprise obtaining genotype data from bone marrow transplant recipients and donors. The autoimmune disease phenotype of the transplant recipient after the transplantation may be used evaluate the effect of genotype on the autoimmune disease. Phenotype comparisons may be made to the transplant donor and/or the transplant recipient prior to the transplantation. The methods may be used to validate genetic models associated with autoimmune disease. The genetic models may be based on one or more genetic variants associated with susceptibility to or protection from an autoimmune disease.