Genetic Optimization for Delivery Route Planning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Inefficient delivery routes continue to add unnecessary costs to delivery businesses due to suboptimal route planning and optimization methods.

Innovation Solution

A route determination system that converts customer addresses to geocoordinates, applies convex hull analysis, and uses genetic optimization to identify and plot the most efficient delivery routes, incorporating features like stop insertion, mutation, and crossover to refine candidate routes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional route planning methods are used, then route creation is simple, but delivery efficiency is low and travel distance is excessive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedelivery efficiencyVSAvoidtravel time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional manual or simple algorithmic route planning with a genetic algorithm-based optimization system. The system uses computational intelligence (genetic algorithms with selection, crossover, and mutation operations) to automatically optimize delivery routes, substituting mechanical/manual planning with intelligent computational systems that can evaluate multiple route combinations and identify optimal paths.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system optimizes routes by dynamically adjusting route parameters such as stop sequence, path selection, and delivery order. The genetic algorithm modifies route parameters across generations, selecting and refining route configurations to minimize total travel distance and time while ensuring all deliveries are completed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If traditional route planning methods are used, then computational resources are saved, but route optimization is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroute optimization precisionVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the route optimization problem into discrete genetic algorithm operations: initialization of candidate routes, evaluation of route fitness, selection of parent routes, crossover to generate new routes, and mutation to introduce variations. This segmentation allows the complex optimization problem to be solved through manageable, iterative computational steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs dynamic optimization where route configurations evolve over multiple generations. The genetic algorithm continuously adapts route solutions based on fitness evaluation, allowing the system to dynamically adjust to find optimal routes rather than relying on static or predetermined paths.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS10346766B1Determination and optimization of delivery routes
Publication Date: 2019.07.09 AMAZON TECH INC
  • US10346766B1 patent drawing
  • US10346766B1 patent drawing
  • US10346766B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed are various embodiments for determining and plotting delivery routes in a computing device. A set of solutions to the traveling salesman problem may be determined by applying a convex hull to determine a set of initial solutions. Computational complexity may be reduced by decreasing the dimensions of the initial solutions. The set of initial solutions may be further optimized by applying genetic optimization to determine the most efficient solutions.