Genomic Variant Identification via Automated Annotation and Filtering

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The high costs and labor associated with analyzing genomic data for identifying genetic variations linked to disease phenotypes remain a challenge, despite the decrease in genomic sequencing costs.

Innovation Solution

A processor-readable medium with code that receives genetic variants from comparing experimental and reference DNA sequences, annotates them based on specific criteria, and filters these variants to identify potential disease-causing variants for clinical diagnosis.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If genomic sequencing is performed to identify genetic variations, then disease-associated variants can be detected, but the cost and labor for data analysis remain high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedisease variant detection accuracyVSAvoiddata analysis efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the data analysis process into distinct functional modules including variant filtering, annotation, prioritization, and interpretation. This modular approach allows each component to be optimized independently and processed in parallel, significantly improving analysis throughput while maintaining detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary filtering and annotation of variants before detailed analysis. By pre-processing the data to eliminate obviously benign variants and annotate key features in advance, the system reduces the computational burden on subsequent analysis steps, thereby improving overall productivity without compromising detection precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If comprehensive annotation and filtering of all variants is performed, then diagnostic accuracy is improved, but the time and computational resources required increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclinical diagnosis accuracyVSAvoidanalysis time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by performing comprehensive annotation and filtering only on variants that pass initial screening criteria. Rather than uniformly processing all variants with the same level of detail, the system adapts the depth of analysis to each variant's characteristics, focusing computational resources on promising candidates while quickly dismissing obvious non-candidates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs partial action by implementing a multi-stage filtering process where not all annotation and filtering operations are applied to every variant. Instead, variants progress through successive filters, with only those meeting specific criteria advancing to more computationally intensive analysis stages, thereby reducing overall processing time while maintaining diagnostic reliability for positive cases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Measurement precision

If manual analysis of genetic variants is performed by healthcare technicians, then detailed evaluation is possible, but labor costs and workload remain constant

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevariant evaluation accuracyVSAvoidtechnician workload
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service by enabling the system to automatically perform variant filtering, annotation, prioritization, and preliminary interpretation without requiring manual intervention at each step. The automated pipeline processes variants through multiple analysis stages, generating prioritized lists that require minimal manual review, thereby significantly reducing technician workload while maintaining evaluation accuracy through algorithmic consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual mechanical analysis by healthcare technicians with automated computational analysis. The software performs variant evaluation using standardized criteria and algorithms, substituting human manual review with machine-based analysis that can process large volumes of data consistently and efficiently, reducing both labor costs and variability in evaluation quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS8718950B2Methods and apparatus for identification of disease associated mutations
Publication Date: 2014.05.06 HUDSONALPHA INST FOR BIOTECH
  • US8718950B2 patent drawing
  • US8718950B2 patent drawing
  • US8718950B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In some embodiments, a non-transitory processor-readable medium includes code to cause a processor to receive a set of variants identified by a comparison of a test DNA sequence with a reference DNA sequence and associate at least one of the set of variants with at least one of a set of annotations each indicative of at least one criterion. The code includes code to cause the processor to filter, based on the set of annotations, the set of variants to identify a subset of variants from the set of variants. Each variant from the subset of variants is associated with at least one common annotation from the set of annotations. The code further includes code to cause the processor to present the subset of variants such that the subset of variants can be used to render a clinical diagnosis.